Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
In article , w.g.s.hamm
writes "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message from MM contains these words: If modern humans were transported briefly back to Victorian London, their sojourn would indeed be brief as many would succumb straightaway to the ordinary everyday noxious substances that hardy workers of the day had got used to from birth. Victorian Londoners' soujourn was also pitifully brief. IIRC, average life expectancy was around 40. This was partly due to the extremely high rate of death among children. It's ludicrous to suggest Victorian Londoners enjoyed a higher standard of health or better survival rates. You have only to look at poor countries' Victorian-London levels of life-expectancy in adults and high infant death rate, to see that people there have not acquired the hardiness you claim used to exist here. It's true that the incidence of allergies, implying over-reacting immune systems, has risen sharply in the last 50 years, but mistaken to blame that on higher standards of hygeine by ultra- fussy parents. It's just as likely that modern immune-systems are weakened by the overload of chemicals, radiation etc we are exposed to in every aspect of western life. I wasn't making an implication but giving anecdotal evidence as supplied by scientists who have indeed found that children growing up on ultra clean homes seem to have more breathing, sinus and glue ear type problems. Ah so you've found some stories to fit a pet opinion, hardly conclusive is it? -- David |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Janet Baraclough writes: | The message | from "w.g.s.hamm" contains these words: | | I wasn't making an implication but giving anecdotal evidence as supplied by | scientists who have indeed found that children growing up on ultra clean | homes seem to have more breathing, sinus and glue ear type problems. | | "Anecdotal evidence" supplied by scientists, or the number 9 bus | queue, is not peer-accredited research, let alone proof of your theory. I have seen references to proper analyses in medical journals. As I understand it, the situation is as I posted before - i.e. it seems that this is a significant factor, but beyond that all is confusion. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:46:10 +0000 (UTC), "Duncan"
wrote: "MM" wrote in message .. . I absolutely agree with this. Today's townie kids' immune systems are shot to pieces because the kids never get their peck of dirt while growing up. When do you see kids playing outside in the fields nowadays? Everyone is scared of 'stranger danger'. If they do go out of doors away from the telly or computer game, they just ride their bikes around. Where's the cowboys and injuns, the lying on the ground playing fives, that kind of thing? Kids (and adults) have little contact with the natural world, then suddenly, panic, as 'bird flu' strikes. If modern humans were transported briefly back to Victorian London, their sojourn would indeed be brief as many would succumb straightaway to the ordinary everyday noxious substances that hardy workers of the day had got used to from birth. MM The hardy ones who had survived diphtheria, scarlet fever, whooping cough, polio, measles, smallpox, cholera and typhoid, that is! Indeed. MM |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
"MM" wrote in message ... On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:46:10 +0000 (UTC), "Duncan" wrote: "MM" wrote in message . .. I absolutely agree with this. Today's townie kids' immune systems are shot to pieces because the kids never get their peck of dirt while growing up. When do you see kids playing outside in the fields nowadays? Everyone is scared of 'stranger danger'. If they do go out of doors away from the telly or computer game, they just ride their bikes around. Where's the cowboys and injuns, the lying on the ground playing fives, that kind of thing? Kids (and adults) have little contact with the natural world, then suddenly, panic, as 'bird flu' strikes. If modern humans were transported briefly back to Victorian London, their sojourn would indeed be brief as many would succumb straightaway to the ordinary everyday noxious substances that hardy workers of the day had got used to from birth. MM The hardy ones who had survived diphtheria, scarlet fever, whooping cough, polio, measles, smallpox, cholera and typhoid, that is! Indeed. ....and lucky, eg they may just not have come in contact with all the above. Plus, dont forget the fact that the diseases have undoubtedly mutated over the years, survival of the fittest applies to the pathogens as much as their hosts. And in that case, it means, pathogens that take longer, or even indefinitely, to kill their host. -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:31:00 +0100, "Tumbleweed"
wrote: "MM" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:46:10 +0000 (UTC), "Duncan" wrote: "MM" wrote in message ... I absolutely agree with this. Today's townie kids' immune systems are shot to pieces because the kids never get their peck of dirt while growing up. When do you see kids playing outside in the fields nowadays? Everyone is scared of 'stranger danger'. If they do go out of doors away from the telly or computer game, they just ride their bikes around. Where's the cowboys and injuns, the lying on the ground playing fives, that kind of thing? Kids (and adults) have little contact with the natural world, then suddenly, panic, as 'bird flu' strikes. If modern humans were transported briefly back to Victorian London, their sojourn would indeed be brief as many would succumb straightaway to the ordinary everyday noxious substances that hardy workers of the day had got used to from birth. MM The hardy ones who had survived diphtheria, scarlet fever, whooping cough, polio, measles, smallpox, cholera and typhoid, that is! Indeed. ...and lucky, eg they may just not have come in contact with all the above. Plus, dont forget the fact that the diseases have undoubtedly mutated over the years, survival of the fittest applies to the pathogens as much as their hosts. And in that case, it means, pathogens that take longer, or even indefinitely, to kill their host. Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM Or being a 15 year old and having your arm, (and a bit of the surf board), bitten off by a Shark and to lay on the surf board and paddle back to the shore using her other arm!! Mike |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"MM" wrote in message ... Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) -- Plural farmworkers as opposed to plural arms with one farm worker ;-)) |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:51:30 +0000 (UTC), "Mike" wrote:
Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM Or being a 15 year old and having your arm, (and a bit of the surf board), bitten off by a Shark and to lay on the surf board and paddle back to the shore using her other arm!! Strewth! MM |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:49:49 +0100, "Tumbleweed"
wrote: "MM" wrote in message .. . Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) The Two Ronnies are reprising their act at the moment. Give 'em a ring! MM |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Tumbleweed
writes "MM" wrote in message .. . Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) ROTFL -- hugh Reply to address is valid at the time of posting |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
"Tumbleweed" wrote in message ... "MM" wrote in message ... Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) Tsk in the olden days the farm worker would have picked both up in his teeth, while smoking 80 fags a day and walked 30 miles to the doctor only after finishing a 18 hour day threshing corn with his severed arms. Nowadays yer don't know yer born. I never could understand what that was supposed to mean :-) |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:13:44 +0100, "w.g.s.hamm"
wrote: "Tumbleweed" wrote in message ... "MM" wrote in message ... Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) Tsk in the olden days the farm worker would have picked both up in his teeth, while smoking 80 fags a day and walked 30 miles to the doctor only after finishing a 18 hour day threshing corn with his severed arms. Nowadays yer don't know yer born. I never could understand what that was supposed to mean :-) No, but with these increasing intrusions on privacy in the womb, where we see the little mites growing up almost from the point where they resemble chickens, embryos will be made to feel responsible for their environment. Expect future Neo Labour governments to apply ASBOs (inserted by test tube, naturally) if too much kicking is observed. What must those poor nurses on materity wards think, what with all the ultrasound piccies they're forced to watch, day in, day out. MM |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"MM" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:13:44 +0100, "w.g.s.hamm" wrote: "Tumbleweed" wrote in message ... "MM" wrote in message ... Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) Tsk in the olden days the farm worker would have picked both up in his teeth, while smoking 80 fags a day and walked 30 miles to the doctor only after finishing a 18 hour day threshing corn with his severed arms. Nowadays yer don't know yer born. I never could understand what that was supposed to mean :-) No, but with these increasing intrusions on privacy in the womb, where we see the little mites growing up almost from the point where they resemble chickens, embryos will be made to feel responsible for their environment. Expect future Neo Labour governments to apply ASBOs (inserted by test tube, naturally) if too much kicking is observed. What must those poor nurses on materity wards think, what with all the ultrasound piccies they're forced to watch, day in, day out. So you watched the programme on channel 4 too :0) |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:30:46 +0100, "w.g.s.hamm"
wrote: "MM" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:13:44 +0100, "w.g.s.hamm" wrote: "Tumbleweed" wrote in message ... "MM" wrote in message ... Luck always comes into survival of the fittest. Often it isn't the fittest, but the luckiest who survive. But how many relatively minor wounds became gangrenous and eventually killed the host because basic first aid wasn't carried out, like washing and bandaging? On the other hand, we have true stories of farm workers carrying their severed arms to a doctor after being crushed by a tractor or combine, and they live to tell the tale. MM I think you'll find its a severed arm, not arms. Both arms severed, you cant carry 'em. Try it and you'll see what I mean :-) Tsk in the olden days the farm worker would have picked both up in his teeth, while smoking 80 fags a day and walked 30 miles to the doctor only after finishing a 18 hour day threshing corn with his severed arms. Nowadays yer don't know yer born. I never could understand what that was supposed to mean :-) No, but with these increasing intrusions on privacy in the womb, where we see the little mites growing up almost from the point where they resemble chickens, embryos will be made to feel responsible for their environment. Expect future Neo Labour governments to apply ASBOs (inserted by test tube, naturally) if too much kicking is observed. What must those poor nurses on materity wards think, what with all the ultrasound piccies they're forced to watch, day in, day out. So you watched the programme on channel 4 too :0) Nope. The trailers were more than I could bear. Too much information. MM |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is a animal chaser/cat utrasonic cat deterrent harmful? | United Kingdom | |||
cat problem ....PLEASE HELP !!?? & what's OP mean? | Gardening | |||
cat problem ....PLEASE HELP !!?? (very long) | Gardening | |||
Cat with F.I.P - problem for vegetables? | Edible Gardening | |||
Cat problem | Australia |