Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have some seeds from globe thistles and a few others and was
wondering when i need to get them under way, what type of soil and temperatures. anyone know? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
HaaRoy wrote: I have some seeds from globe thistles and a few others and was wondering when i need to get them under way, what type of soil and temperatures. anyone know? My thistles and teasle seem to prefer to grow where they decide to self seed and not where I plant them and fuss over them. However I did sow originals into open ground. My soil is quite poor and sandy. It is both anoying and rewarding to grow plants that seem to thrive when left to their own devices. So get the first ones going and then leave them alone. Foxgloves I find are another good self seeder -- Derek Banks Read the "MORNING STAR" daily newspaper for PEACE and SOCIALISM |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:27:05 +0000, HaaRoy wrote:
I have some seeds from globe thistles and a few others and was wondering when i need to get them under way, what type of soil and temperatures. anyone know? I won't hit it with you right away but I have, at the bottom of this message, given you a list of 37 plants which have the word "thistle" in their common name. Not only that, although most of them are from the family Compositae, a couple of them are even from different families (Labiatae and Chenopodiaceae). Does it make a difference? Well you are talking to a newbie seed sower here who has just taken delivery of a clutch of packets from Chiltern Seeds. A select few of these packets had very specific instructions stuck to them. It seems that the seeds of certain plants will not germinate unless their biological processes are activated with moisture and moderate warmth and then they are banished into near freezing temperatures for a goodly while. This period of cold is apparently essential to their metabolism and it is only after they have endured this that they can gird their loins for their final Oom Pah Pah in conditions resembling the coming of Spring with its warmth. Looking it up, I can deduce that Echinops ritro (Globe thistle - the one you identified) is one such plant and should be sown in a cold frame. Whether or not it first of all needs a wake up call with the damp and not quite so cold (Lets pretend it's Autumn?) I have no idea. I have a little text file which I transcribed from the label on Chilterns seeds which I have dubbed "Chiltern's cold seeds" I think if you want to start them off immediately I would recommend you follow it. Chiltern cold seeds: 1. 64 - 72 F 2/4 wks 17 - 22 C 2. 25 - 40 F 4/6 wks -4 - 4 C 3. Return to to more than 65 F 19 C Indeed, if the seeds don't sprout the first season you are strongly advised to leave them to experience the full cycle of temperature environments and expect them to emerge the following year. To avoid stress for myself and thereby probably the plants too, each of my 3.5" pots is enclosed in its little greenhouse consisting of a clear polythene sandwich bag tied tight closed with a wire tie (often supplied with the bags) but leaving a fair amount of air inside the bubble. In this way I can be sure that they will never (or scarcely ever) need watering. However, because this is an ideal environment for fungii and other pathogens I also intend giving them a treatment of Cheshunts Compound as recommended. Which medium to use seems controversial. Chiltern seeds say that the success rate with Levington's Peat based compost far exceeds John Innes loam based. Maybe the objection to Levington's is based on environmental principles (the ransacking of peat bogs). My kitchen table seems to have been transformed to a potting bench! As for the "few other thistles" - well maybe one of them is the Scotch Thistle (Onopordum acanthium) (which, in cultivation, I would regard as more exotic than the Echinops). It seems that can be sown in Spring and do without the near freeze. Please remember that I said I'm a newbie and you should take the advice of any of the seasoned gardeners who respond to you if their advice is contrary to that I have given you. Respect Hussein - the list follows! Carduus crispus Welted thistle Carduus nutans Musk thistle Carlina acaulis Stemless carline thistle Carlina vulgaris Carline thistle Carthamnus lanatus Distaff thistle Centaurea calcitrapa Common star thistle Centaurea iberica Iberian star thistle Centaurea melitensis Maltese star thistle Centaurea solstitialis St. Barnaby's/Yellow Star thistle Cicerbita alpina Blue sow thistle Cirsium acaulon Stemless thistle Cirsium arvense Creeping thistle Cirsium brevistylum Indian thistle Cirsium eatoni Eaton's thistle Cirsium edule Edible thistle Cirsium eriophorum Wooly thistle Cirsium hookerianum White thistle Cirsium occidentale Cobwebby thistle Cirsium ochrocentrum Yellow spined thistle Cirsium oleraceum Cabbage thistle Cirsium pallidum Pale thistle Cirsium palustre Marsh thistle Cirsium tuberosum Tuberous thistle Cirsium undulatum Wavy-leaved thistle Cirsium vulgare Common thistle Cnicus benedictus Blessed thistle Echinops ritro Globe thistle Onopordum acanthium Scotch thistle Onopordum illyricum Cotton thistle Salsola kali ruthenica Prickly Russian thistle Salvia carduacea Thistle sage Scolymus maculatus Spotted golden thistle Silybum marianum Milk thistle Sonchus arvensis Field milk thistle Sonchus asper Prickly sow thistle Sonchus oleraceus Sow thistle |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Hussein M.
writes Hussein - the list follows! That's a fascinating list of thistles Hussein and it illustrates how much variation occurs under common or popular name descriptions of plants. RHS Plantfinder CD 2000/01 gives an even wider range of plants with 'thistle' in their name including six varieties of Globe Thistle, most of which are listed as echinops. I have always thought of Globe Artichokes, Cynara scolymus and Cardoon, Cynara cardunculus as edible relatives of the common garden thistle, Cirsium vulgare. They are in the compositae family, but none of the five varieties of Cynara listed in Plantfinder have 'thistle' in their name. What all of those plants share is vigour and hardiness, welcome enough in cropping, but less so in decorative gardening. -- Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Alan Gould
writes I have always thought of Globe Artichokes, Cynara scolymus and Cardoon, Cynara cardunculus as edible relatives of the common garden thistle, Cirsium vulgare. They are in the compositae family, but none of the five varieties of Cynara listed in Plantfinder have 'thistle' in their name. What all of those plants share is vigour and hardiness, welcome enough in cropping, but less so in decorative gardening. Most of the plants called thistles belong to a sub-group classified as Cardueae, which also includes Cardoons, Cornflowers, Knapweeds, et alia. Sow-thistles are an exception; they are related to Dandelions, Lettuces, Hawkweeds et al (Lactuceae). -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Stewart Robert Hinsley
writes Most of the plants called thistles belong to a sub-group classified as Cardueae, which also includes Cardoons, Cornflowers, Knapweeds, et alia. Sow-thistles are an exception; they are related to Dandelions, Lettuces, Hawkweeds et al (Lactuceae). Thanks Stewart. The plot re. plant relationship thickens here a bit, but all of those you mention are in the Compositae family, though in different genera and species of that group. Some of them are also mentioned as species or sub-species within the Asteraceae family, and use the synonym Lactuca for differentiation. Plantfinder gives twenty varieties of Sow-thistle, with the common Sow-thistle listed as Sonchus oleraceus. -- Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:27:05 +0000, HaaRoy wrote:
i managed to find globe thistels in a propogation book and it just says grow them in situ april to june. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:01:30 +0000, Alan Gould
wrote: Most of the plants called thistles belong to a sub-group classified as Cardueae, which also includes Cardoons, Cornflowers, Knapweeds, et alia. Sow-thistles are an exception; they are related to Dandelions, Lettuces, Hawkweeds et al (Lactuceae). Thanks Stewart. The plot re. plant relationship thickens here a bit, but all of those you mention are in the Compositae family, though in different genera and species of that group. Some of them are also mentioned as species or sub-species within the Asteraceae family, and use the synonym Lactuca for differentiation. Plantfinder gives twenty varieties of Sow-thistle, with the common Sow-thistle listed as Sonchus oleraceus. Phew. Managed to include a word from the subject line in the quote above. Anyway. I just wanted to add to these observations concerning nomenclature that there may well be a _really_ grand re-ordering of this when they start classifying according to DNA and individual genes. It's already begun to happen hasn't it? Rspct Hussein |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:20:57 +0000, HaaRoy wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:27:05 +0000, HaaRoy wrote: i managed to find globe thistels in a propogation book and it just says grow them in situ april to june. In that case I suppose you would have to be prepared to wait until the next year for the first flower. I also suppose that the best time to sow any seed in situ is that time when the plant seeded to produce the seeds. Rspct Hussein |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Hussein M.
writes Anyway. I just wanted to add to these observations concerning nomenclature that there may well be a _really_ grand re-ordering of this when they start classifying according to DNA and individual genes. It's already begun to happen hasn't it? Yes, but Asteraceae/Compositae seems to be one of the more robust bits of the classification (excepting the past dismemberment of Chyrsanthemum). For an overview see URL:http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/...ers/asteralesw eb.htm#Asteraceae Elsewhere, not only has Liliaceae been chopped into lots of little pieces, as previously proposed, but it's spread across two orders (into one of which Orchidaceae is sunk). Or for my summary on Malvaceae, see http://www.meden.demon.co.uk/Malvace.../overview.html http://www.meden.demon.co.uk/Malvace...ttneriina.html http://www.meden.demon.co.uk/Malvace...alvatheca.html tho' I haven't incorporated recent data on Hibiscus, Pavonia, etc. I stumbled across a suggestion that Veronica will swallow Hebe and Parahebe yesterday evening. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Hussein M.
writes Anyway. I just wanted to add to these observations concerning nomenclature that there may well be a _really_ grand re-ordering of this when they start classifying according to DNA and individual genes. It's already begun to happen hasn't it? That sounds a pretty formidable task, but if such is happening I would hope that food plants and natural or wild plants are given equal attention to floral and exotic. The Cruciferae family, particularly the brassicaceae are long overdue for revision and re-classification IMHO. -- Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Alan Gould
writes In article , Hussein M. writes Anyway. I just wanted to add to these observations concerning nomenclature that there may well be a _really_ grand re-ordering of this when they start classifying according to DNA and individual genes. It's already begun to happen hasn't it? That sounds a pretty formidable task, but if such is happening I would hope that food plants and natural or wild plants are given equal attention to floral and exotic. It is precisely the 'natural or wild plants' which are the subject of the classification. The aim, as ever in taxonomy, is to get closer and closer to the natural evolution of plants The Cruciferae family, particularly the brassicaceae are long overdue for revision and re-classification IMHO. What particular aspects worry you? -- Kay Easton Edward's earthworm page: http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/garden/ |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Alan Gould
writes That sounds a pretty formidable task, but if such is happening I would hope that food plants and natural or wild plants are given equal attention to floral and exotic. The Cruciferae family, particularly the brassicaceae are long overdue for revision and re-classification IMHO. Extensive sequencing of individual species mostly applies to crop plants (e.g. rice, cotton), but also to thale cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) which is used as a model plant in the study of plant developmental biology. Beyond that there is a bias towards the wild relatives of crop plants (e.g. plenty of sequences of wild cottons), and to recently described species (presumably because the researchers have material to hand). In several groups well known ornamentals are missing from the set of species for which sequences are published (e.g. H. syriacus and H. mutabilis in Hibiscus). Take a look at EMBL/DDBJ or Genbank. PS: Cruciferae and Brassicaceae are one and the same, with Capparaceae/Capparidaceae sunk therein in recent classifications. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley http://www.meden.demon.co.uk/Malvace...directory.html |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Alan Gould
writes Thanks Stewart. The plot re. plant relationship thickens here a bit, but all of those you mention are in the Compositae family, though in different genera and species of that group. Some of them are also mentioned as species or sub-species within the Asteraceae family, and use the synonym Lactuca for differentiation. Plantfinder gives twenty varieties of Sow-thistle, with the common Sow-thistle listed as Sonchus oleraceus. Cardueae and Lactuceae (or Cichorieae) are subdivisions of Compositae; I took that as understood. Asteraceae and Compositae are the same. [The current rules are that family names are derived from generic names, but some old family names are grandfathered in Leguminosae = Fabaceae Guttiferae = Hypericaceae Graminales = Poaceae Labiatae = Lamiaceae Compositae = Asteraceae Cruciferae = Brassicaceae Umbelliferae = Apiaceae and any more I've forgotten.] -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The message
from Hussein M. contains these words: I also suppose that the best time to sow any seed in situ is that time when the plant seeded to produce the seeds. Well...no, it isn't, especially in areas which have cold or wet winters. Autumn-sown open ground seeds usually have far lower germination and poorer survival rates than the same seeds properly stored, then planted in the same place in Spring. Seeds in open ground do better when soil is warming up not cooling down, and when daylength is lengthening not shortening. Janet. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What is this growing in my garden? picture 2 S_edge 15th Oct 2009 growing in my garden 02 S_edge.JPG [2/2] | Garden Photos | |||
What is this growing in my garden? picture 2 S_edge 15th Oct 2009 growing in my garden 02 S_edge.JPG [1/2] | Garden Photos | |||
Seeds, Seeds, Seeds | Edible Gardening | |||
how to get rid of fast growing grass in low growing lawn? | Gardening | |||
Beginners help on growing from seeds | Bonsai |