On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:28:20 GMT, "P.Kyle esquire"
wrote:

What the hell are you talking about?

Michael Saunby?

--
Paul {Hamilton Rooney}

Owner of the newsgroup demon.local

"Chris {Hamilton Hill} will certainly post the appropriate email if required" - J {Hamilton K}
"What sort of proof would you like? I could post the email from Demon's
legal team, complete with headers" - Chris {Hamilton Hill}
Oho!

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:44:12 +0100, "Michael Saunby"
wrote:


"Ray" wrote in message
...

"Michael Saunby" wrote in message
...

"Jack Harrison" wrote in message
.. .

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...
A hearty well done to Animal Aid and co for their efforts in
educating
people on the abuse of animals.


So I take it if you need medical treatment that involves drugs, you
will
refuse on the basis that life saving drugs might have been tested on
animals?

Might? So which prescribed drugs have not been tested on animals?
Which
household cleaning products, etc. have not been safety tested on
animals?
Surely the answer is as close to none as makes no difference.


Do you ever take medication of any sort? If so, then the word
"hypocrisy"
spring to mind.



ARist, hypocrite, same difference.

Michael Saunby.





Vivisectionists, researchers, scientists call them what you will, they
are
all a bunch of "cowards" who abuse animals for a salary.

OTH. Michael Saunby is the only person who admits, in open forum, that he
abuses animals for pleasure.

What can you call this kind of person?


Another victim of the AR lie machine? See http://www.vare.org.uk for other
examples of the way AR extremists such as Ray use lies and the threat of
lies to terrorise decent honest people who refuse to accept the dishonest
propaganda ARists.

It speaks volumes to learn that you support actions like this - ref :
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/thi...p?story=543009

QUOTE
Last week the man, who wishes to remain anonymous, received a note headed:
"A serious warning from Animal Rights Activists."
It said: "If the company does not stop building the animal laboratory at
Oxford within one week a letter about you will mailed to hundreds of your
neighbours. This letter will make several allegations about your personal
life. It will also contain a forged criminal record showing a string of
sexual offences committed by yourself throughout your adult life."

END QUOTE

I know you have already destroyed your life saunby but it sounds like
you could do worse than to take heed of your own material.

Seems you have something against treating yourself as you treat
others? just as well there are anti bullies out there to deal with the
likes of you.

Seems that UK AR activist standards of honesty and decency are no better in
their dealings outwith Usenet. Why doesn't that surprise me? The sooner
the lot of you are locked up the better!

Because you pose as an AR advocate sending forged threats and
intimidations "pretending" to be pro animal rights, hoping it will
actually help you pro animal abuse logic? Bwhahahahahahahahaha.

Hands up anybody who has fallen for saunbys confused thinking yet?






Cheerio,

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:19:28 +0000 (UTC), "Ray"
wrote:


"Michael Saunby" wrote in message
...

"Ray" wrote in message
...

"Michael Saunby" wrote in message
...

"Jack Harrison" wrote in message
.. .

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...
A hearty well done to Animal Aid and co for their efforts in
educating
people on the abuse of animals.


So I take it if you need medical treatment that involves drugs, you
will
refuse on the basis that life saving drugs might have been tested on
animals?

Might? So which prescribed drugs have not been tested on animals?
Which
household cleaning products, etc. have not been safety tested on
animals?
Surely the answer is as close to none as makes no difference.


Do you ever take medication of any sort? If so, then the word
"hypocrisy"
spring to mind.



ARist, hypocrite, same difference.

Michael Saunby.





Vivisectionists, researchers, scientists call them what you will, they
are
all a bunch of "cowards" who abuse animals for a salary.

OTH. Michael Saunby is the only person who admits, in open forum, that
he
abuses animals for pleasure.

What can you call this kind of person?


Another victim of the AR lie machine? See http://www.vare.org.uk for
other
examples of the way AR extremists such as Ray use lies and the threat of
lies to terrorise decent honest people who refuse to accept the dishonest
propaganda ARists.

It speaks volumes to learn that you support actions like this - ref :
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/thi...p?story=543009

QUOTE
Last week the man, who wishes to remain anonymous, received a note headed:
"A serious warning from Animal Rights Activists."
It said: "If the company does not stop building the animal laboratory at
Oxford within one week a letter about you will mailed to hundreds of your
neighbours. This letter will make several allegations about your personal
life. It will also contain a forged criminal record showing a string of
sexual offences committed by yourself throughout your adult life."

END QUOTE

Seems that UK AR activist standards of honesty and decency are no better
in
their dealings outwith Usenet. Why doesn't that surprise me? The sooner
the lot of you are locked up the better!

Michael Saunby



Never mind the links Micheal.

Let us deal with something a little closer to home. - Your lack of
integrity.

Last week you started a posting Subject header "This Battle Must Be Won"
21:7:04 on this newsgroup and several others.

During the ensuing thread which developed you made a serious mistatke, YOU
ACTUALLY TOLD THE TRUTH. [My lifestyle does involve killing for sport]
These words are yours Michael, they have not been distorted or changed and
are in the archives of 'Google' for all to see.

At this point Derek interjected with the following:


[ "I don't hunt."
Michael Saunby http://tinyurl.com/5ow8r

"Anyway, I don't hunt. I don't much care for hunting"
Michael Saunby http://tinyurl.com/62ubf

"**** off you ignorant ****. I've told you often enough
- I DON'T HUNT."
Michael Saunby http://tinyurl.com/4narw

You're just a damned liar, Saunby.]

As a reasonable person, I asked Derek to hang fire and give you time for
clarification of your statement. He kindly complied.

Subsequently, I gave you numerous opportunities to retract your statement as
the question of a typo was raised by your fellow Canadian deviant "Dutch". I
also gave you a list of alternatives to help you out of your quandary. My
kindness was not appreciated and indeed, I received nothing other than
abuse.

So Michael, we can only assume that you have a serious problem, you actually
take delight and pleasure from inflicting or watching animals suffer.

You are in no position to be critical of ARAs, in fact you are in no
position to post at all. Clearly you are mentally disturbed.

I have proved, with your help, you a-

A Liar
A Fraud
A Pervert

What more do you want?

If indeed you do want more I can also add masochist.


This is a very clever post using the old foot in mouth snare. Saunby
fell for it hook line and sinker.

This post will be archived forever and reposted now and again for the
benefit of saunbys temper. LOL






Cheerio,

On 25 Jul 2004 19:38:35 +0100, go@fish (Vicar Peter Parsnip) wrote:

Be still! and revere Oz, who blessed us with their presence on 25 Jul
2004...

P.Kyle esquire writes

STOP ABUSING INTERNET

YES!

A good opportunity for newbies to learn how to use their killfiles....

Your sig is too big for demon.local. Reduce it, or we will dig, threaten
and sue. It's remarkable what a little digging can produce. Oho!


LOL LAH. I can name many stuck up tits who discovered this to their
disgust, saunby, ogilvie, maclaren, etc....



Cheerio,

Paul Rooney wrote in
:

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:28:20 GMT, "P.Kyle esquire"
wrote:

What the hell are you talking about?

Michael Saunby?


He smells.

--
Phil Kyle esq.

http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/

"That's not cheese, it's the product of an unwashed foreskin."

- Craig "I like cheese" Oldfield

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:31:45 +0100, Derek Moody
wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:44:12 +0100, "Michael Saunby"
wrote:


"Ray" wrote in message
...

"Michael Saunby" wrote in message
...

"Jack Harrison" wrote in message
.. .

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...
A hearty well done to Animal Aid and co for their efforts in
educating
people on the abuse of animals.


So I take it if you need medical treatment that involves drugs, you
will
refuse on the basis that life saving drugs might have been tested on
animals?

Might? So which prescribed drugs have not been tested on animals?
Which
household cleaning products, etc. have not been safety tested on
animals?
Surely the answer is as close to none as makes no difference.


Do you ever take medication of any sort? If so, then the word
"hypocrisy"
spring to mind.



ARist, hypocrite, same difference.

Michael Saunby.





Vivisectionists, researchers, scientists call them what you will, they
are
all a bunch of "cowards" who abuse animals for a salary.

OTH. Michael Saunby is the only person who admits, in open forum, that he
abuses animals for pleasure.

What can you call this kind of person?


Another victim of the AR lie machine? See http://www.vare.org.uk for other
examples of the way AR extremists such as Ray use lies and the threat of
lies to terrorise decent honest people who refuse to accept the dishonest
propaganda ARists.

It speaks volumes to learn that you support actions like this - ref :
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/thi...p?story=543009

QUOTE
Last week the man, who wishes to remain anonymous, received a note headed:
"A serious warning from Animal Rights Activists."
It said: "If the company does not stop building the animal laboratory at
Oxford within one week a letter about you will mailed to hundreds of your
neighbours. This letter will make several allegations about your personal
life. It will also contain a forged criminal record showing a string of
sexual offences committed by yourself throughout your adult life."

END QUOTE

I know you have already destroyed your life saunby but it sounds like
you could do worse than to take heed of your own material.

Seems you have something against treating yourself as you treat
others? just as well there are anti bullies out there to deal with the
likes of you.

Seems that UK AR activist standards of honesty and decency are no better in
their dealings outwith Usenet. Why doesn't that surprise me? The sooner
the lot of you are locked up the better!

Because you pose as an AR advocate sending forged threats and
intimidations "pretending" to be pro animal rights, hoping it will
actually help you pro animal abuse logic? Bwhahahahahahahahaha.

Hands up anybody who has fallen for saunbys confused thinking yet?

This will be a great law if it offers us protection from the kooks
like ogilvie, saunby, bradbury and co, who have been waging their
lunatic pro hunt campaign at great cost to decent folks lives. I fail
to see why it has taken the police so long to act against these
outright criminal kooks, who are a danger to themselves let alone
civilized society.

I hope it's retrospective too.

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 15:48:26 +0100, wrote:

the angling papers claim fishing is the most popular "sport"
I thought a sport was something competing humans did with a ball or a track
to run round. I don't think anything that involves distressing another
living being as sport.

Not much "sport" in any of those pervert pursuits. Some sport, when
the victim is required not to be allowed to fight back. Next they'll
be calling pedophilia a sport in that case!


That's hunting and hunting is not sport.
Hunting is what one does, to get ones dinner if the shops are to far away!!!

Most of the lardarses involved in animal abuse these days get their
burgers from Tesco. I wonder what makes some people play rugby,
football, skydive, rally driving etc, putting their life on the line,
and others would rather go for the soft option and bully wildlife?

"Jack Harrison" wrote in message
.. .

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...
A hearty well done to Animal Aid and co for their efforts in educating
people on the abuse of animals.


So I take it if you need medical treatment that involves drugs, you will
refuse on the basis that life saving drugs might have been tested on
animals?

Might? So which prescribed drugs have not been tested on animals? Which
household cleaning products, etc. have not been safety tested on animals?
Surely the answer is as close to none as makes no difference.


Do you ever take medication of any sort? If so, then the word
"hypocrisy"
spring to mind.



ARist, hypocrite, same difference.

Michael Saunby

Be still! and revere , who blessed us with their presence on 25 Jul
2004...

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:19:59 +0100, "Alex"
wrote:

uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!skynet.be!212.159.2.65.MISMATCH!nntp-peering.p
lus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool02.plus.net!ptn-nntp-rea
der02.plus.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex"
Newsgroups:
demon.local,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.p olitics.animals,uk.enviro
nment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.bird s,uk.rec.gardening,uk.bus
iness.agriculture,uk.rec.fishing.coarse References:
Subject: OXFORD
BUILDERS BACK OUT of animal research laboratory at Oxford. HOORAY
another one bites the dust. Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:19:59 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Lines: 13
Message-ID:
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: e8eb426b.ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net
X-Trace:
DXC=[In?cP?l5cM7=`K@d0m\LGigd3Y`7Rb;N37XnI;[OUCD8X`C147l5CkoMET[V[6OKVc\
VLboh^2OdNT3d3^n`R@ X-Complaints-To:
Xref: uni-berlin.de demon.local:262958
alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian:159519 talk.politics.animals:338929
uk.environment.conservation:59361 uk.rec.birdwatching:101052
scot.birds:6232 uk.rec.gardening:261443 uk.business.agricultu169046
uk.rec.fishing.coarse:39785

Angling is set to achieve what was once thought impossible this Autumn
as the Government unveils its plans to protect the sport from all
external threats. (Angling Times July 2004)
Good news even if I am a little cynical. How many anglers of voting age
in the UK? Is their a general election some time next year?

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
. ..
A hearty well done to Animal Aid and co for their efforts in educating
people on the abuse of animals.


STOP ABUSING INTERNET

You first.

--
The Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
VISIT ME ONLINE AT: http://peterparsnip.blogspot.com/

"Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with
the rod, he shall not die." -- Proverbs 23:13 (AV)