Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
does someone recognize this flower
Hello,
Last summer I saw this in a summer pot. Does anyone know what it is please. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
does someone recognize this flower
On 29/01/2017 16:57, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:00:56 +0100, kerrygirl wrote: Hello, Last summer I saw this in a summer pot. Does anyone know what it is please. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: 20160727_191903[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16480| |Filename: 20160727_191851[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16481| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ I'm sorely tempted to suggest a white pelargonium, commonly but incorrectly called geranium, but the leaves aren't right. Another reason why it's not a pelargonium is that the flowers of sympetalous (petals fused together) rather than choripetalous (petals separate). I make the floral formula K(5)C(5)A2+2G1. Googling finds me a database of floral formulae by plant family (http://www.bakoma-tex.com/doc/latex/...r-ex-en-x.pdf), which tells me that this is Scrophulariaceae. There are relatively few Scrophulariaceae with zygomorphic (radially symmetric) flowers, and some googling leads me to Chaenostoma cordatum, also known as Sutera cordata and Bacopa, which is a common hanging basket plant. -- SRH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
does someone recognize this flower
On 29/01/17 17:41, Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
On 29/01/2017 16:57, Chris Hogg wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:00:56 +0100, kerrygirl wrote: Hello, Last summer I saw this in a summer pot. Does anyone know what it is please. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: 20160727_191903[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16480| |Filename: 20160727_191851[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16481| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ I'm sorely tempted to suggest a white pelargonium, commonly but incorrectly called geranium, but the leaves aren't right. Another reason why it's not a pelargonium is that the flowers of sympetalous (petals fused together) rather than choripetalous (petals separate). I make the floral formula K(5)C(5)A2+2G1. Googling finds me a database of floral formulae by plant family (http://www.bakoma-tex.com/doc/latex/...r-ex-en-x.pdf), which tells me that this is Scrophulariaceae. There are relatively few Scrophulariaceae with zygomorphic (radially symmetric) flowers, and some googling leads me to Chaenostoma cordatum, also known as Sutera cordata and Bacopa, which is a common hanging basket plant. Don't you mean "relatively few Scrophulariaceae with NON-zygomorphic flowers", or did you mean to use "actinomorphic" instead of "zygomorphic"? A good find, anyway, Stewart! -- Jeff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
does someone recognize this flower
On 30/01/2017 13:27, Jeff Layman wrote:
On 29/01/17 17:41, Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote: On 29/01/2017 16:57, Chris Hogg wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:00:56 +0100, kerrygirl wrote: Hello, Last summer I saw this in a summer pot. Does anyone know what it is please. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: 20160727_191903[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16480| |Filename: 20160727_191851[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16481| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ I'm sorely tempted to suggest a white pelargonium, commonly but incorrectly called geranium, but the leaves aren't right. Another reason why it's not a pelargonium is that the flowers of sympetalous (petals fused together) rather than choripetalous (petals separate). I make the floral formula K(5)C(5)A2+2G1. Googling finds me a database of floral formulae by plant family (http://www.bakoma-tex.com/doc/latex/...r-ex-en-x.pdf), which tells me that this is Scrophulariaceae. There are relatively few Scrophulariaceae with zygomorphic (radially symmetric) flowers, and some googling leads me to Chaenostoma cordatum, also known as Sutera cordata and Bacopa, which is a common hanging basket plant. Don't you mean "relatively few Scrophulariaceae with NON-zygomorphic flowers", or did you mean to use "actinomorphic" instead of "zygomorphic"? A good find, anyway, Stewart! Yep. Should have been non-zygomorphic, or actinomorphic, flowers - can be sure at this remove which I was thinking. Insufficient co-ordination between thinking and typing. -- SRH |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
does someone recognize this flower
On 30/01/17 15:17, Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
On 30/01/2017 13:27, Jeff Layman wrote: On 29/01/17 17:41, Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote: On 29/01/2017 16:57, Chris Hogg wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:00:56 +0100, kerrygirl wrote: Hello, Last summer I saw this in a summer pot. Does anyone know what it is please. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: 20160727_191903[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16480| |Filename: 20160727_191851[1].jpg | |Download: http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=16481| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ I'm sorely tempted to suggest a white pelargonium, commonly but incorrectly called geranium, but the leaves aren't right. Another reason why it's not a pelargonium is that the flowers of sympetalous (petals fused together) rather than choripetalous (petals separate). I make the floral formula K(5)C(5)A2+2G1. Googling finds me a database of floral formulae by plant family (http://www.bakoma-tex.com/doc/latex/...r-ex-en-x.pdf), which tells me that this is Scrophulariaceae. There are relatively few Scrophulariaceae with zygomorphic (radially symmetric) flowers, and some googling leads me to Chaenostoma cordatum, also known as Sutera cordata and Bacopa, which is a common hanging basket plant. Don't you mean "relatively few Scrophulariaceae with NON-zygomorphic flowers", or did you mean to use "actinomorphic" instead of "zygomorphic"? A good find, anyway, Stewart! Yep. Should have been non-zygomorphic, or actinomorphic, flowers - can be sure at this remove which I was thinking. Insufficient co-ordination between thinking and typing. PEBCAK ;-) -- Jeff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|