Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
Hi all
Anyone got any good suggestions for evergreen shrubs that would do ok in a large pot, shady north facing? Flowers would be nice, nothing too boring like box or conifers Thinking of a cammelia for one. Is that workable? What would go with it? Thanks! Kate x |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
On 2014-02-07 20:20:45 +0000, Kate said:
Hi all Anyone got any good suggestions for evergreen shrubs that would do ok in a large pot, shady north facing? Flowers would be nice, nothing too boring like box or conifers Thinking of a cammelia for one. Is that workable? What would go with it? Thanks! Kate x Sarcococca? Strongly scented winter flowers. If you had a trellis or obelisk in your container that might extend your choices. You could grow a Camellia but sooner or later, it would probably need to go into the ground. You could perhaps consider an azalea, too. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
On 07/02/2014 22:56, Sacha wrote:
On 2014-02-07 20:20:45 +0000, Kate said: Hi all Anyone got any good suggestions for evergreen shrubs that would do ok in a large pot, shady north facing? Flowers would be nice, nothing too boring like box or conifers Thinking of a cammelia for one. Is that workable? What would go with it? Thanks! Kate x Sarcococca? Strongly scented winter flowers. If you had a trellis or obelisk in your container that might extend your choices. You could grow a Camellia but sooner or later, it would probably need to go into the ground. You could perhaps consider an azalea, too. I think camellias have a very shallow root system (says he having re-potted a 20 year old specimen just yesterday). Several round here flower profusely in relatively small containers where, in normal weather conditions, the foliage protects the soil from water-logging in winter. The £5.99 jobs from Aldi look very healthy but, as ever, the root ball is a concern. I do wonder whether perhaps they should have been re-potted this time last year. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
On 08/02/2014 12:24, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:20:45 +0000 (UTC), Kate wrote: Hi all Anyone got any good suggestions for evergreen shrubs that would do ok in a large pot, shady north facing? Flowers would be nice, nothing too boring like box or conifers Thinking of a cammelia for one. Is that workable? What would go with it? Thanks! Kate x If you do opt for a camellia, azalea or dwarf rhododendron (all perfectly OK in that position IMO), don't forget to use ericaceous compost in the planter, and make sure the planter is itself a decent size to allow for root growth. Keep it fed and watered in the summer. Are you sure about those plants doing well in a north-facing position? They will no doubt survive, and probably grow and give some flowers. But they would do much better in a position with better light, at least for part of the day.. They are really plants for dappled sunlight, not full shade. -- Jeff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
In article ,
Jeff Layman wrote: On 08/02/2014 12:24, Chris Hogg wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:20:45 +0000 (UTC), Kate wrote: Anyone got any good suggestions for evergreen shrubs that would do ok in a large pot, shady north facing? Flowers would be nice, nothing too boring like box or conifers Thinking of a cammelia for one. Is that workable? What would go with it? If you do opt for a camellia, azalea or dwarf rhododendron (all perfectly OK in that position IMO), don't forget to use ericaceous compost in the planter, and make sure the planter is itself a decent size to allow for root growth. Keep it fed and watered in the summer. Are you sure about those plants doing well in a north-facing position? They will no doubt survive, and probably grow and give some flowers. But they would do much better in a position with better light, at least for part of the day.. They are really plants for dappled sunlight, not full shade. Not critically, if the position is light. A lot of the radiation in the UK is indirect, and an open north position can get more light than deep but dappled shade. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
On 2014-02-08 16:22:49 +0000, Jeff Layman said:
On 08/02/2014 12:24, Chris Hogg wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:20:45 +0000 (UTC), Kate wrote: Hi all Anyone got any good suggestions for evergreen shrubs that would do ok in a large pot, shady north facing? Flowers would be nice, nothing too boring like box or conifers Thinking of a cammelia for one. Is that workable? What would go with it? Thanks! Kate x If you do opt for a camellia, azalea or dwarf rhododendron (all perfectly OK in that position IMO), don't forget to use ericaceous compost in the planter, and make sure the planter is itself a decent size to allow for root growth. Keep it fed and watered in the summer. Are you sure about those plants doing well in a north-facing position? They will no doubt survive, and probably grow and give some flowers. But they would do much better in a position with better light, at least for part of the day.. They are really plants for dappled sunlight, not full shade. The OP says shady, not deep shade. I'd be inclined to think of that as 'edge of woodland' type light. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com South Devon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
getstats - A society in which our lives and choices are enriched by an understanding of statistics. Go to www.getstats.org.uk for more information |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pot shrub
On 08/02/2014 18:11, sacha wrote:
On 2014-02-08 16:22:49 +0000, Jeff Layman said: On 08/02/2014 12:24, Chris Hogg wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:20:45 +0000 (UTC), Kate wrote: Hi all Anyone got any good suggestions for evergreen shrubs that would do ok in a large pot, shady north facing? If you do opt for a camellia, azalea or dwarf rhododendron (all perfectly OK in that position IMO), Are you sure about those plants doing well in a north-facing position? They will no doubt survive, and probably grow and give some flowers. But they would do much better in a position with better light, at least for part of the day.. They are really plants for dappled sunlight, not full shade. The OP says shady, not deep shade. I'd be inclined to think of that as 'edge of woodland' type light. It's interesting how differently we can interpret wording! I interpreted "shady north facing" as being a particularly dark site, otherwise why bother adding "shady"? A north facing site generally has poor light, and is considered shady. Few plants are happy in deep shade - ferns being an exception. I may be wrong, but aren't the plants in question generally native to more southerly latitudes and higher altitudes than those found in the UK? Sunlight would be more intense in those regions, too, so dappled sunlight there would equate to somewhat more light in the UK. -- Jeff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|