Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
"Peter Duncanson [BrE]" wrote in message ... On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:12:52 +0100, "GordonD" wrote: "Ophelia" wrote in message ... "GordonD" wrote in message ... Hi, O! Didn't know you hung out here (or are you in gardening?) You might be surprised where I hang out ... *mysterious wink* makes mental note to keep the curtains drawn at all times ObAUE: Is that drawn meaning open or drawn meaning closed? Good question Does this mean I can spy on him, or not? -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
Robert Bannister wrote:
On 21/10/12 1:36 AM, Peter Duncanson [BrE] wrote: ObAUE: Is that drawn meaning open or drawn meaning closed? Serious question: can "drawn" ever mean the curtains are open? I would have thought that it had to be "drawn back" or "open" and that "drawn" always meant they were closed. This is different from the action of drawing and the verb to draw the curtains, on the other hand, which are always ambiguous. I looked through Google Books instances of "curtains were drawn" plus the word "light," and I think you're usually right. If "drawn" is not modified then it usually appears to mean closed, as in: 1820 - being moved on the pillow by the nurse; she experienced great throbbing, and intolerance of light and noise, -- the curtains were drawn, and the bells in the house were ordered not to be rung. 1825 - .... Every eatable that the season afforded, supplied the table -- the curtains were drawn, and the chandeliers were illuminated with wax. The transition from day- light, to this artificial splendor, exhilirated the spirits of the guests, who However, this one seems to go the other way: Lady Chatterley's Lover by D.H. Lawrence Page 246 Then he woke up and looked at the light. The curtains were drawn. He listened to the loud wild calling of blackbirds and thrushes in the wood. It would be a brilliant morning, about half past five, his hour for rising. I'm not sure what this means. He might have seen the light in the gaps (chinks). It doesn't say he got out of bed to peer around the curtains. If they were open because a maid had been there, she was darned early. Maybe they had never been closed. Maybe they were even permanently tied back. -- Best -- Donna Richoux |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
On 21/10/2012 13:06, Donna Richoux wrote:
Robert Bannister wrote: On 21/10/12 1:36 AM, Peter Duncanson [BrE] wrote: ObAUE: Is that drawn meaning open or drawn meaning closed? Serious question: can "drawn" ever mean the curtains are open? I would have thought that it had to be "drawn back" or "open" and that "drawn" always meant they were closed. However, this one seems to go the other way: Lady Chatterley's Lover by D.H. Lawrence Page 246 Then he woke up and looked at the light. The curtains were drawn. He listened to the loud wild calling of blackbirds and thrushes in the wood. It would be a brilliant morning, about half past five, his hour for rising. I'm not sure what this means. He might have seen the light in the gaps (chinks). It doesn't say he got out of bed to peer around the curtains. If they were open because a maid had been there, she was darned early. Maybe they had never been closed. Maybe they were even permanently tied back. Which light is he looking at? The light of the dawn outside or the one inside? We need some more context to decide what state the curtains were in. It seems they were closed... Then he woke up and looked at the light. The curtains were drawn. He listened to the loud wild calling of blackbirds and thrushes in the wood. It would be a brilliant morning, about half past five, his hour for rising. He had slept so fast! It was such a new day! The woman was still curled asleep and tender. His hand moved on her, and she opened her blue wondering eyes, smiling unconsciously into his face. "Are you awake?" she said to him. He was looking into her eyes. He smiled, and kissed her. And suddenly she roused and sat up. "Fancy that I am here!" she said. She looked round the whitewashed little bedroom with its sloping ceiling and gable window where the white curtains were closed. The room was bare save for a little yellow-painted chest of drawers, and a chair: and the smallish white bed in which she lay with him. -- Phil Cook |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
On 21/10/12 8:06 PM, Donna Richoux wrote:
Lady Chatterley's Lover by D.H. Lawrence Page 246 Then he woke up and looked at the light. The curtains were drawn. He listened to the loud wild calling of blackbirds and thrushes in the wood. It would be a brilliant morning, about half past five, his hour for rising. I'm not sure what this means. He might have seen the light in the gaps (chinks). It doesn't say he got out of bed to peer around the curtains. If they were open because a maid had been there, she was darned early. Maybe they had never been closed. Maybe they were even permanently tied back. That is certainly confusing. At the age when I read that book, I doubt I would have noticed passages like that. -- Robert Bannister |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
Lewis wrote:
In message Robert Bannister wrote: On 21/10/12 1:36 AM, Peter Duncanson [BrE] wrote: ObAUE: Is that drawn meaning open or drawn meaning closed? Serious question: can "drawn" ever mean the curtains are open? I would have thought that it had to be "drawn back" or "open" and that "drawn" always meant they were closed. This is different from the action of drawing and the verb to draw the curtains, on the other hand, which are always ambiguous. I thought 'draw the curtains' meant "open them", but drawn curtains were closed. More like "pull". Pull them closed if they are open, pull them open if they are closed. Neither phrase (nor curtains, for that matter) is common in my life. -- Best -- Donna Richoux |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
"Donna Richoux" wrote in message
... Lewis wrote: In message Robert Bannister wrote: On 21/10/12 1:36 AM, Peter Duncanson [BrE] wrote: ObAUE: Is that drawn meaning open or drawn meaning closed? Serious question: can "drawn" ever mean the curtains are open? I would have thought that it had to be "drawn back" or "open" and that "drawn" always meant they were closed. This is different from the action of drawing and the verb to draw the curtains, on the other hand, which are always ambiguous. I thought 'draw the curtains' meant "open them", but drawn curtains were closed. More like "pull". Pull them closed if they are open, pull them open if they are closed. Neither phrase (nor curtains, for that matter) is common in my life. I really, *really* wish I'd said "make sure the blinds are closed"... -- Gordon Davie Edinburgh, Scotland "Slipped the surly bonds of Earth...to touch the face of God." |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
On 21/10/2012 13:36, Phil Cook wrote:
On 21/10/2012 13:06, Donna Richoux wrote: Robert Bannister wrote: On 21/10/12 1:36 AM, Peter Duncanson [BrE] wrote: ObAUE: Is that drawn meaning open or drawn meaning closed? Serious question: can "drawn" ever mean the curtains are open? I would have thought that it had to be "drawn back" or "open" and that "drawn" always meant they were closed. However, this one seems to go the other way: Lady Chatterley's Lover by D.H. Lawrence Page 246 It seems they were closed... Then he woke up and looked at the light. The curtains were drawn. He listened to the loud wild calling of blackbirds and thrushes in the wood. It would be a brilliant morning, about half past five, his hour for rising... She looked round the whitewashed little bedroom with its sloping ceiling and gable window where the white curtains were closed. The room was bare save for a little yellow-painted chest of drawers, and a chair: and the smallish white bed in which she lay with him. Bad form replying to myself, but if I had included a little more we would have seen that She would have suggested they draw the curtains to open them. So the act of opening or closing the curtains is drawing them but if they are described as drawn I would say they have been closed. -- Phil Cook |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
In article , Lewis
writes I thought 'draw the curtains' meant "open them", but drawn curtains were closed. Oh now i would think "draw the curtains" meant close them. -- Janet Tweedy |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:07:49 +0100, Janet Tweedy wrote:
In article , Lewis writes I thought 'draw the curtains' meant "open them", but drawn curtains were closed. Oh now i would think "draw the curtains" meant close them. FWIIW In my family it can mean either - you workout which, based on the current state. Avpx -- One day I'll be dead and THEN you'll all be sorry. (alt.fan.pratchett) 15:30:01 up 1 day, 21:52, 7 users, load average: 0.43, 0.61, 0.66 |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
On 10/22/2012 10:34 AM, The Nomad wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:07:49 +0100, Janet Tweedy wrote: In article , Lewis writes I thought 'draw the curtains' meant "open them", but drawn curtains were closed. Oh now i would think "draw the curtains" meant close them. FWIIW In my family it can mean either - you workout which, based on the current state. It's a toggle then. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not" in Reply To. |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
"'Mike'" writes:
"Peter James" wrote in message ... Don Phillipson wrote: "David Hill" wrote in message ... A cousin of mine lost her daughter to cancer a short while ago. She raised the following question. A man who loses his wife is a widower, a woman who loses her husband is a widow, a child who loses a parent is an orphan. Why is there no word in the English language for a parent who loses a child? Perhaps because before 1900 this was so common: most parents lost at least one child to illness, i.e. bereavement was normal and required no special word. Back in the days of my youth, I took part in a Historical Survey of a mining area in Cornwall, and one of the things we did was to survey the local graveyards for the years 1720 -1890.. We were all struck by the number of gravestones listing the names of children who had died in infancy and we buried in the family plot. In one case, 13 children 11 of whom died in infancy. One grave, which I shall never forget in St Cleer graveyar near to Liskeard, was dedicated to the memory of a girl who died aged 16 years of age. It bore the following epitaph. "Pray spare a thought as you pass by, As you are now so once was I. As I am now, so will you be, So be prepared to follow me" All food for thought. It was a very harrowing experience. Peter Part of the Masonic ritual states 'and death, the grand leveller of all human greatness, reduces us to the same state' "O dark dark dark. They all go into the dark, The vacant interstellar spaces, the vacant into the vacant, The captains, merchant bankers, eminent men of letters, The generous patrons of art, the statesmen and the rulers, Distinguished civil servants, chairmen of many committees, Industrial lords and petty contractors, all go into the dark," |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
Arcadian Rises writes:
On Oct 19, 8:20Â*am, "Don Phillipson" wrote: wrote in message ... In uk.rec.gardening R H Draney wrote: I've come across that several times in my family tree. I think one poor family had three attempts to get a child called John, before succeeding. Â*It seems - in these cases - either an attempt to carry on a family name, or perhaps a tribute to the child that had died. . . . I can imagine it being rather confusing for /everyone/, unless they dismissed any reference to the first child from any future conversation! We can however approach this empirically. Â* When family histories offer no evidence anyone found this confusing 150 years ago, it is fair to say there was probably no such confusion. True. They could refer to "the late John" and "the living John" Also, "Jessica the old maid" or "The stuttering Jim", "the limping Howard", "the dimwitted Eddie" to distinguish them from their namesakes in those pre-PC ages. All all the Welsh Jones-the-somethings. I know someone who gave up investigating their family history when they got to a wedding where both participants, all the witnesses, and the presiding clergy were called Jones. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
On 10/28/2012 11:10 AM, Dr Nick wrote:
I know someone who gave up investigating their family history when they got to a wedding where both participants, all the witnesses, and the presiding clergy were called Jones. In my mother's family that would be Mackay and Gordon. And they tended to use the same limited set of forenames. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:10:53 +0000, Dr Nick
wrote: Arcadian Rises writes: On Oct 19, 8:20*am, "Don Phillipson" wrote: wrote in message ... In uk.rec.gardening R H Draney wrote: I've come across that several times in my family tree. I think one poor family had three attempts to get a child called John, before succeeding. *It seems - in these cases - either an attempt to carry on a family name, or perhaps a tribute to the child that had died. . . . I can imagine it being rather confusing for /everyone/, unless they dismissed any reference to the first child from any future conversation! We can however approach this empirically. * When family histories offer no evidence anyone found this confusing 150 years ago, it is fair to say there was probably no such confusion. True. They could refer to "the late John" and "the living John" Also, "Jessica the old maid" or "The stuttering Jim", "the limping Howard", "the dimwitted Eddie" to distinguish them from their namesakes in those pre-PC ages. All all the Welsh Jones-the-somethings. I know someone who gave up investigating their family history when they got to a wedding where both participants, all the witnesses, and the presiding clergy were called Jones. In Malta, some official forms used to, and perhaps still, provide spaces for Surname, Forenames, and Nickname. -- Mike. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
OT Serious question
The Nomad wrote on Mon, 22 Oct 2012
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:07:49 +0100, Janet Tweedy wrote: In article , Lewis writes I thought 'draw the curtains' meant "open them", but drawn curtains were closed. Oh now i would think "draw the curtains" meant close them. FWIIW In my family it can mean either - you workout which, based on the current state. This is one of those words that I feel I never certainly remember the meaning of, probably because I've included in my mental encoding, "It's the opposite of what you think", and then can not remember what it was I originally thought. On looking through Google I can see I'm right to be confused. It's clearly been used in both senses. Even Johnson, in his 1827 dictionary, records the two opposing meanings: "15. To unclose or slide back curtains Go draw aside the curtains, and discover The sev'ral caskets to the noble prince. -- Shakespeare Alarm'd, and with presaging heart he came, And drew the curtain, and expos'd the dame. -- Dryden 16. To close or spread curtains Philoclea intreated Pamella to open her grief, who, drawing the curtain, that the light might not complain of her blushing, was ready to speak. -- Sidney" Generally, it looks as if the 'closing' sense predominates. -- Iain Archer |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Serious Tools for Serious Gardeners | Gardening | |||
Serious question: Urine as a nitrogen source for organiccomposting | Gardening | |||
This is a serious debatable question about Black Widow spiders | Gardening | |||
This is a serious debatable question about Black Widow spiders | United Kingdom | |||
SERIOUS ETHICAL question about what i've done | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |