Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, but
not after reading the magazine supplements that come inside the newspapers or the television guide magazines. I wondering what the significance is with regard to using sheets from the magazines with regard to wrapping food. I know you are not suppose to use newspaper. But is it alright to use the magazine sheets for wrapping food? Also are they both alright to use in garden composting? This question is also relevant when using dampened magazine sheets to clean down food surfaces and clean windows etc. Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any advice. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/07/10 13:19, Owain wrote:
On 27 July, 13:11, "john hamilton" wrote: After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, but not after reading the magazine supplements that come inside the newspapers or the television guide magazines. I wondering what the significance is with regard to using sheets from the magazines with regard to wrapping food. I know you are not suppose to use newspaper. But is it alright to use the magazine sheets for wrapping food? If this is in commercial premises: No. You're not allowed to use anything that isn't 'food grade' for wrapping food. And recycled material is specifically excluded. Also are they both alright to use in garden composting? This question is also relevant when using dampened magazine sheets to clean down food surfaces and clean windows etc. It's not acceptable to use newspapers or magazines for cleaning food surfaces. Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any advice. More likely different inks. Owain I guess that the coloured inks in magazines are nastier than newspaper ink. [g] |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "john hamilton" wrote in message ... After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, but not after reading the magazine supplements that come inside the newspapers or the television guide magazines. I wondering what the significance is with regard to using sheets from the magazines with regard to wrapping food. I know you are not suppose to use newspaper. But is it alright to use the magazine sheets for wrapping food? Also are they both alright to use in garden composting? This question is also relevant when using dampened magazine sheets to clean down food surfaces and clean windows etc. Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any advice. I think you only need to use your nose: though with widespread colour the line between magazine and newspaper is increasingly blurred. Most magazines smell horrible, and many give me a headache, therefore the ink isn't dry, and you don't want it in your food. (Some may be done on photocopiers, but even cured plastic toner can transfer on to say over head projector slides if you leave them stacked together too long.) I'm a bit out of date but one of the more headachy solvents I used to hate and smell in magazines was cyclohexanone. There are large numbers of inks and formulations as there is still a touch of alchemy involved. Many magazines still have ink that doesn't dry completely and you can quite often get a reversed image if you insert a piece of plastic and weigh it down for a while. You probably don't smudge it because most of the time your fingers are on the border of a magazine whereas you tend to touch the ink when you are folding the newspaper to read it. Shiny magazine paper is a pain to anyone who likes to make notes in margins etc. as biro smudges all over the place and pencil either won't write on it or rips it to pieces. Years ago they did feature non dirty newspaper ink in Tomorrow's World. Like everything else in that prog, it never caught on. S |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 July, 13:11, "john hamilton" wrote:
After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, but not after reading the magazine supplements that come inside the newspapers or the television guide magazines. I wondering what the significance is with regard to using sheets from the magazines with regard to wrapping food. I know you are not suppose to use newspaper. But is it alright to use the magazine sheets for wrapping food? Also are they both alright to use in garden composting? This question is also relevant when using dampened magazine sheets to clean down food surfaces and clean windows etc. Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done differently between the magazines and the newspapers? * *Thanks for any advice. Newspaper is made almost entirely out of bleached wood fibres and won't take a sharp image. Magazine paper has a high proportion of china clay in it which give the smoother finish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coated_paper Traditionally at least newspaper ink had traces of antimony and lead from the type metal. (poisonous) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_metal I think this is why they gave up wrapping fish & chips in newspaper! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 12:11 am, "john hamilton" wrote:
After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, When I were a lad, my mother used to make our sandwiches on newspaper. I was sometimes able to read the writing on my sandwiches by using a mirror! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
john hamilton wrote:
Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any advice. The paper is much different. Glossy magazine paper is filled with kaolin (a mineral) and casein (protein from milk) as sizing and surface treatment. The printing process is also much different, with many more steps for a magazine page. For example, when there is both a glossy and a dull surface texture on the same page, that means they've done an extra pass to print a layer of shellac. Magazine papers may also have odorant additives. I would not use those papers for anything. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owain burst on the scene, and said:
On 27 July, 18:06, "Spamlet" wrote: Years ago they did feature non dirty newspaper ink in Tomorrow's World. Like everything else in that prog, it never caught on. * The Breathalyser (1967) * The ATM (1969) * The pocket calculator (1971) * The digital watch (1972) * Teletext (Ceefax) (1975) * The personal stereo (1980) * The compact disc and player (1981) * The camcorder (1981) * Barcode reader (1983) * Radio Automation, pioneered on Pirate FM 102 (1992) * Clockwork radio (1993) (wikipedia) Makes you wonder how they kept TW going for so long! ![]() -- Michaelangelo www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel Self-catering, holiday accommodation in the Scottish Highlands - for disabled people: www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Spamlet" wrote in message ... "john hamilton" wrote in message ... After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, but not after reading the magazine supplements that come inside the newspapers or the television guide magazines. I wondering what the significance is with regard to using sheets from the magazines with regard to wrapping food. I know you are not suppose to use newspaper. But is it alright to use the magazine sheets for wrapping food? Also are they both alright to use in garden composting? This question is also relevant when using dampened magazine sheets to clean down food surfaces and clean windows etc. Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any advice. I think you only need to use your nose: though with widespread colour the line between magazine and newspaper is increasingly blurred. Most magazines smell horrible, and many give me a headache, therefore the ink isn't dry, and you don't want it in your food. (Some may be done on photocopiers, but even cured plastic toner can transfer on to say over head projector slides if you leave them stacked together too long.) I'm a bit out of date but one of the more headachy solvents I used to hate and smell in magazines was cyclohexanone. There are large numbers of inks and formulations as there is still a touch of alchemy involved. Many magazines still have ink that doesn't dry completely and you can quite often get a reversed image if you insert a piece of plastic and weigh it down for a while. You probably don't smudge it because most of the time your fingers are on the border of a magazine whereas you tend to touch the ink when you are folding the newspaper to read it. Shiny magazine paper is a pain to anyone who likes to make notes in margins etc. as biro smudges all over the place and pencil either won't write on it or rips it to pieces. Years ago they did feature non dirty newspaper ink in Tomorrow's World. Like everything else in that prog, it never caught on. I don't have any trouble with the Daily Mail, the ink does not stain my fingers and I have used it for wrapping apples when putting them in storage. Alan S |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article I304o.354599$NW.290714@hurricane,
alan.holmes wrote: "Spamlet" wrote in message ... Shiny magazine paper is a pain to anyone who likes to make notes in margins etc. as biro smudges all over the place and pencil either won't write on it or rips it to pieces. Years ago they did feature non dirty newspaper ink in Tomorrow's World. Like everything else in that prog, it never caught on. I don't have any trouble with the Daily Mail, the ink does not stain my fingers and I have used it for wrapping apples when putting them in storage. Well, I am glad that that it has some uses. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/28/10 03:22, Owain wrote:
On 27 July, 18:06, "Spamlet" wrote: Years ago they did feature non dirty newspaper ink in Tomorrow's World. Like everything else in that prog, it never caught on. * The Breathalyser (1967) * The ATM (1969) * The pocket calculator (1971) Electronic calculator, roughly the size of an adding machine, came out much earlier. Nixie tubes. * The digital watch (1972) Pulsars -- red LEDs of some sortg -- came out in the early 60s. Expensive. * Teletext (Ceefax) (1975) * The personal stereo (1980) * The compact disc and player (1981) * The camcorder (1981) * Barcode reader (1983) * Radio Automation, pioneered on Pirate FM 102 (1992) * Clockwork radio (1993) (wikipedia) Admittedly we are still waiting for the car that folds up into a suitcase ....and flies. -- Cheers, Bev xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them." -- Lionel |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Real Bev wrote:
On 07/28/10 03:22, Owain wrote: On 27 July, 18:06, "Spamlet" wrote: Years ago they did feature non dirty newspaper ink in Tomorrow's World. Like everything else in that prog, it never caught on. * The Breathalyser (1967) * The ATM (1969) * The pocket calculator (1971) Electronic calculator, roughly the size of an adding machine, came out much earlier. Nixie tubes. Nope, not that much earlier. * The digital watch (1972) Pulsars -- red LEDs of some sortg -- came out in the early 60s. Nope, later than that. Expensive. * Teletext (Ceefax) (1975) * The personal stereo (1980) * The compact disc and player (1981) * The camcorder (1981) * Barcode reader (1983) * Radio Automation, pioneered on Pirate FM 102 (1992) * Clockwork radio (1993) (wikipedia) Admittedly we are still waiting for the car that folds up into a suitcase ...and flies. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 29, 3:58 pm, The Real Bev wrote:
On 07/28/10 17:39, 234 wrote: The Real Bev wrote: * The pocket calculator (1971) Electronic calculator, roughly the size of an adding machine, came out much earlier. Nixie tubes. Nope, not that much earlier. Yeah it was. We may still have it :-( I used an electronic calculator with Nixie tubes in 1962 at University. Quite possbly this model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumlock_ANITA_calculator |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Real Bev :
On 07/28/10 03:22, Owain wrote: * The digital watch (1972) Pulsars -- red LEDs of some sortg -- came out in the early 60s. Are you sure? Wikipedia says: In the spring of 1972, the first Pulsar watch was marketed by The Hamilton Watch Co. [...] With an 18-karat gold case, the world's first all-electronic digital watch was also the first to use a digital display — created with LEDs. -- Mike Barnes |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Real Bev burst on the scene, and said:
Nope, later than that. Nope yourself. Well, maybe they took that long to hit Oz, but I remember being at a gas station in Bakersfield and asking a guy to push the button on his Pulsar. This is before our first kid was born in 1964. We also acquired a stray calico kitten there, which we gave to my mother-in-law. She was an exceptionally good cat, and now Bakersfield cats have assumed a position of superiority in our family. Your memory isn't as accurate as the watch. The first Pulsar watch was announced in 1970. -- Michaelangelo www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel Self-catering, holiday accommodation in the Scottish Highlands - for disabled people: www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matty F burst on the scene, and said:
I used an electronic calculator with Nixie tubes in 1962 at University. Quite possbly this model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumlock_ANITA_calculator Electronic calculators appeared in the '60s but *pocket* calculators were a product of the '70s. -- Michaelangelo www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel Self-catering, holiday accommodation in the Scottish Highlands - for disabled people: www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
let's kill in the clean structures, but don't clean the difficult raindrops | United Kingdom | |||
How Clean is Clean? | Ponds | |||
How Clean is Clean? | Ponds | |||
[IBC] Pure Gold in your magazine rack.... or maybe not. | Bonsai | |||
Oldie but goodie (off topic but not quite) | United Kingdom |