Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
In time
What will your garden look like in 2,000,000 (2 Million) years time?
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Mike -- .................................................. .............. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In time
On Feb 19, 5:20*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
(The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In time
-- .................................................. .............. "moghouse" wrote in message ... On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote: (The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! ------------------------------ and you think you are important? Sorry, NO subscribers to this newsgroup are important, no matter what they think. Kindest possible regards Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In time
In message
, moghouse writes On Feb 19, 5:20*pm, "'Mike'" wrote: (The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In time
-- .................................................. .............. "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message ... In message , moghouse writes On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote: (The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how important are you in the minute time we are here? Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-))) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In time
'Mike' wrote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In time
"'Mike'" wrote in message ... -- .................................................. ............. "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message ... In message , moghouse writes On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote: (The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how important are you in the minute time we are here? Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-))) sigh I have no idea what my garden will look like even a million years hence. It's not anything I will have to worry about. At the moment it's full of snowdrops and the species crocus are rearing their heads, it's lovely and gives me hope that spring is not far away. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In time
In article ,
Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote: In message , moghouse writes On Feb 19, 5:20*pm, "'Mike'" wrote: (The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.) Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility, I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of course. Personally, I like Reginald's views on evolution: "in most people that I know, the process is far from complete." This thread merely confirms me in by views. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In time
On Feb 19, 7:46*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
-- .................................................. ............. "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in ... In message , moghouse writes On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote: (The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how important are you in the minute time we are here? Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-)))- Hide quoted text - OK, I confess....I haven't had a big bang lately! I'm really sorry you have such a low opinion of your self - sadly I think you may be right. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In time
wrote in message ... Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility, I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of course. This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she understands English. Until she saw this ;-) LOL Tina |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In time
In message , Christina Websell
writes wrote in message ... Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility, I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of course. This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she understands English. Until she saw this ;-) LOL The way I put the sentiment is that any sufficiently advanced physics is indistinguishable from nonsense. (Tip of the hat to Sir Arthur.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In time
In article ,
Christina Websell wrote: wrote in message ... Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility, I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of course. This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she understands English. Until she saw this ;-) LOL Well, I am a professional pedant :-) Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In time
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:39:52 -0800 (PST), moghouse
wrote: On Feb 19, 7:46*pm, "'Mike'" wrote: -- .................................................. ............. "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in ... In message , moghouse writes On Feb 19, 5:20 pm, "'Mike'" wrote: (The Earth is reputed to be 36,000,000,000 years old. That is 36 Thousand Million) Just think, how important are you really? ........ ;-) Well the real point is, Mike, all those years of evolution and improvement have been leading up to..........me! He could at least have got the age right. (The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old; the estimates of the time that have passed since the Big Bang have converged on 13.7 billion years.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley Which goes to show, that no matter which figures you apply, man's presence on Earth is nothing less than a layer of dust. So I ask again, how important are you in the minute time we are here? Not at all, but look how important SOME people think they are :-)))- Hide quoted text - OK, I confess....I haven't had a big bang lately! I'm really sorry you have such a low opinion of your self - sadly I think you may be right. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In time
In article ,
Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote: In message , Christina Websell writes Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility, I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of course. This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she understands English. Until she saw this ;-) LOL The way I put the sentiment is that any sufficiently advanced physics is indistinguishable from nonsense. (Tip of the hat to Sir Arthur.) Yes :-) Actually, that's not the thing that annoys me most about the cosmologists - it's the way that all their evidence depends on a very complicated analysis of the data, which can only be done by assuming their hypothesis! It's tortoises all the way down .... We have damn-all direct evidence of general relativity at high space- time stresses, or even that the red shift is due to recession, and there are alternative hypotheses that are mathematically consistent and compatible with known physics. Yes, they're probably wrong, but that doesn't prove the current hypotheses are right. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In time
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message ... In message , Christina Websell writes wrote in message ... Well, given that most current cosmology would be rejected from a fiction competition on the grounds of insufficient plausibility, I am disinclined to criticise anyone for choosing an arbitrarily different figure. I am not inclined to believe him, either, of course. This is beautiful. I'm going to send it to my German friend, she thinks she understands English. Until she saw this ;-) LOL The way I put the sentiment is that any sufficiently advanced physics is indistinguishable from nonsense. (Tip of the hat to Sir Arthur.) Oh, stop it! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|