Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Photographed in one of the wilder (woodland) areas at the University of
Liverpool Botanic Gardens, and I had assumed it was wild - there are several other species growing wild there. http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran168.jpg (plant) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran169.jpg (flowers) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran179.jpg (flower) Having checked Keble-Martin I'm suspecting a pale-flowered form of Geranium phaeum. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote... Photographed in one of the wilder (woodland) areas at the University of Liverpool Botanic Gardens, and I had assumed it was wild - there are several other species growing wild there. http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran168.jpg (plant) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran169.jpg (flowers) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran179.jpg (flower) Having checked Keble-Martin I'm suspecting a pale-flowered form of Geranium phaeum. Seems to be a problem with the Photos, the first is only the top bit and the last won't load at all. However I would agree with you from what I can see. -- Regards Bob H 17mls W. of London.UK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Bob Hobden
writes "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote... Photographed in one of the wilder (woodland) areas at the University of Liverpool Botanic Gardens, and I had assumed it was wild - there are several other species growing wild there. http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran168.jpg (plant) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran169.jpg (flowers) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran179.jpg (flower) Having checked Keble-Martin I'm suspecting a pale-flowered form of Geranium phaeum. Seems to be a problem with the Photos, the first is only the top bit and the last won't load at all. However I would agree with you from what I can see. The last is a typo. (Sorry!) Try http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran170.jpg The problem with the first is presumably a problem with the network connection between the hosting company and your computer. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message ... In message , Bob Hobden writes "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote... Photographed in one of the wilder (woodland) areas at the University of Liverpool Botanic Gardens, and I had assumed it was wild - there are several other species growing wild there. http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran168.jpg (plant) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran169.jpg (flowers) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran179.jpg (flower) Having checked Keble-Martin I'm suspecting a pale-flowered form of Geranium phaeum. Seems to be a problem with the Photos, the first is only the top bit and the last won't load at all. However I would agree with you from what I can see. The last is a typo. (Sorry!) Try http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran170.jpg The problem with the first is presumably a problem with the network connection between the hosting company and your computer. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley I agree with Bob, its either a Geranium phaeum or one of its hybrids like x monocense Anglicum -- Charlie, gardening in Cornwall. http://www.roselandhouse.co.uk Holders of National Plant Collections of Clematis viticella (cvs) and Lapageria rosea |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Charlie Pridham
writes "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message ... In message , Bob Hobden writes "Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote... Photographed in one of the wilder (woodland) areas at the University of Liverpool Botanic Gardens, and I had assumed it was wild - there are several other species growing wild there. http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran168.jpg (plant) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran169.jpg (flowers) http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran179.jpg (flower) Having checked Keble-Martin I'm suspecting a pale-flowered form of Geranium phaeum. Seems to be a problem with the Photos, the first is only the top bit and the last won't load at all. However I would agree with you from what I can see. The last is a typo. (Sorry!) Try http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran170.jpg The problem with the first is presumably a problem with the network connection between the hosting company and your computer. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley I agree with Bob, its either a Geranium phaeum or one of its hybrids like x monocense Anglicum Having cogitated on your responses, and have performed a little extra research, I'm am in agreement that it is that, particular Geranium phaeum var. lividum or Geranium x monacense nothovar anglicum. It's a pity I don't have a face-on photograph of a flower as the petal length to breadth ratio appears to be a convenient criterion for distinguishing the taxa. Thanks. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which herb in which bath! | United Kingdom | |||
which rose | Roses | |||
Which rights for which animals? (was: problem with this newsgroup) | Ponds | |||
Which rights for which animals? (was: problem with this newsgroup) | Ponds | |||
which tarp to use? | Lawns |