On Mar 10, 2:54 pm, Sacha wrote:
On 10/3/07 12:54, in article , "June





Hughes" wrote:
In message m,
" writes
On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote:
On 10 Mar, 12:03, "

wrote:
Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this
morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg
anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form
on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me.

What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot.
I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as
you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will
then be more serious than you would have ever expected.

So let it rest once and for all.

I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking
about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I
have.

Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the
matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are
done.

You are now a figure of fun.

Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here.
Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng
before people like Alan Gould left.

I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin or
allow her to email me. Once a person with bad intentions has someone's
email headers, they can alter the content of the email to anything they want
to say. And as Helene has roundly abused her position both at work and on
this group to harass me and Judith Lea, it is right that the group should
know what she gets up to, both on and off group.
It would be rather more to the point if we heard your voice condemning her
disgusting behaviour, something that has yet to happen, rather than
appearing to want to sweep it under the mat.
--
Sachahttp://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devonhttp://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Unfortunately this now fits in with La Puce's claims last October -
and now it seems La Puce is sending June alleged emails that you have
allegedly sent to her, why send them to June??? What a shame as I had
given June the benefit of the doubt.

Judith

Judith

On 10/3/07 15:09, in article
, "La Puce"
wrote:

On 10 Mar, 14:54, Sacha wrote:
I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin

But you did, last sunday at 15.46 subject title 'My Family'. I didn't
responded though. Forwarded to you June.

That wasn't correspondence. That was a declaration of intent.

From:
Subject: My famiy
Date: 4 March 2007 15:36:25 GMT
To:

One more personal remark from you about me or my family and another
complaint about your vicious behaviour will go straight to URBED.**


--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk

I wonder why you feel it necessary to forward emails to June? Is June Puce's
apologist or would Puce like us to think that, perhaps? And I wonder
whether what she received is what I sent. No matter, the warning stands and
my intentions are clear.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

On 10 Mar, 16:14, Sacha wrote:
That wasn't correspondence. That was a declaration of intent.

Leave it for crying out loud, JUST LEAVE IT!!! You said you wouldn't
dream of emailing me. I responded by saying you did. Now you said it
wasn't but a declaration.

Go away please leave us alone.

On 10/3/07 16:25, in article
, "La Puce"
wrote:

On 10 Mar, 16:14, Sacha wrote:
That wasn't correspondence. That was a declaration of intent.

Leave it for crying out loud, JUST LEAVE IT!!! You said you wouldn't
dream of emailing me. I responded by saying you did. Now you said it
wasn't but a declaration.

Go away please leave us alone.

Leave my family alone and I will leave you alone. Do not come near this
place again.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

On 10 Mar, 16:07, "
wrote:
Unfortunately this now fits in with La Puce's claims last October -
and now it seems La Puce is sending June alleged emails that you have
allegedly sent to her, why send them to June???

My god. Do you actually hold a job?! Sacha said that under no
circumstances she would email me, and she said that to June. So I
replied that she did, on Sunday and that I will forward that email to
June since it's June that asked about taking it to email. Is this
*that* difficult to understand?

Now Sacha has posted it, saying it wasn't an email but a
declaration ... But I won't even go into this. It's beyond ridiculous
now. You ladies have far too much time on your hands it seems.

In message .com, La
Puce writes
On 10 Mar, 14:54, Sacha wrote:
I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin

But you did, last sunday at 15.46 subject title 'My Family'. I didn't
responded though. Forwarded to you June.


I don't recall seeing Sacha's post of 10 March saying anything to me.
Nor do I recall posting anything requiring such a reply from her.
However, I have been out all day, so I may have missed it. (For a
start, she would not say 'I'm sorry' to me.) Looks as though the post
may be a forgery by one of the trolls like the one pretending to be
Chris.
--
June Hughes

In message .com,
" writes
On Mar 10, 2:54 pm, Sacha wrote:
On 10/3/07 12:54, in article , "June





Hughes" wrote:
In message m,
" writes
On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote:
On 10 Mar, 12:03, "

wrote:
Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this
morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg
anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form
on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me.

What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot.
I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as
you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will
then be more serious than you would have ever expected.

So let it rest once and for all.

I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking
about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I
have.

Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the
matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are
done.

You are now a figure of fun.

Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here.
Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng
before people like Alan Gould left.

I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin or
allow her to email me. Once a person with bad intentions has someone's
email headers, they can alter the content of the email to anything they want
to say. And as Helene has roundly abused her position both at work and on
this group to harass me and Judith Lea, it is right that the group should
know what she gets up to, both on and off group.
It would be rather more to the point if we heard your voice condemning her
disgusting behaviour, something that has yet to happen, rather than
appearing to want to sweep it under the mat.
--
Sachahttp://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devonhttp://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Unfortunately this now fits in with La Puce's claims last October -
and now it seems La Puce is sending June alleged emails that you have
allegedly sent to her, why send them to June??? What a shame as I had
given June the benefit of the doubt.

Oh for goodness sake. Get a grip. I received an email from Puce this
evening when I returned from a pleasant day out. I did not encourage
this email and furthermore am not interested in any of your bitchy
little squabbles. I am surprised to see Sacha posting 'I am sorry
June' to me and have already posted a reply to Puce's posting saying I
thought it may be a forgery. I was not addressing Sacha in my post - I
was addressing you. Are you really as thick as you make out?

As for your munificent 'benefit of the doubt' - I want nothing more to
do with you and had already kill-filed you in ukfd. Now kindly go and
get on with your life and try not to be as stupid as you make out. Just
leave me alone.

--
June Hughes

In message m,
" writes
On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message m,
" writes



On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote:
On 10 Mar, 12:03, "

wrote:
Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this
morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg
anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form
on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me.

What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot.
I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as
you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will
then be more serious than you would have ever expected.

So let it rest once and for all.

I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking
about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I
have.

Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the
matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are
done.

You are now a figure of fun.

Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here.
Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng
before people like Alan Gould left.
--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Your comments may have been more accurate if you had added "used to be
a good newsgroup before La Puce joined in". I am sure you read the
comments of all the well respected gardeners putting her right about
matters?

If you feel that you must comment on this posting, then may I
respectfully request that you take it to email.

You really are as thick as you make out.
--
June Hughes

On Mar 10, 8:24 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message .com,
Oh for goodness sake. Get a grip. I received an email from Puce this
evening when I returned from a pleasant day out. I did not encourage
this email and furthermore am not interested in any of your bitchy
little squabbles. I am surprised to see Sacha posting 'I am sorry
June' to me and have already posted a reply to Puce's posting saying I
thought it may be a forgery. I was not addressing Sacha in my post - I
was addressing you. Are you really as thick as you make out?

As for your munificent 'benefit of the doubt' - I want nothing more to
do with you and had already kill-filed you in ukfd. Now kindly go and
get on with your life and try not to be as stupid as you make out. Just
leave me alone.

--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Really June, then it's a good job that I have kept all yoiur emails
isn''t it, you have played your last card and shown your hand, what a
miserable two faced person you are, as for killfiling me, good, I
wouldn't want to associate with anything like you,or your like you
have ben caught out, yet again and as for taking it to email, it's
pity you didn't take your own advice especially the whining email you
sent wheedling an invite to Sacha's meet, now sod off.

On Mar 10, 8:24 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message m,
" writes



On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message m,
" writes

On Mar 10, 12:21 pm, "La Puce" wrote:
On 10 Mar, 12:03, "

wrote:
Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this
morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg
anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form
on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me.

What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot.
I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as
you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will
then be more serious than you would have ever expected.

So let it rest once and for all.

I have no idea what you are on about, Sacha's letter??? I am talking
about the letter that Nic Falk sent to your husband, a copy of which I
have.

Mrs. Rudlin I don't have to say anymore, you know the truth of the
matter and so does everyone who matters on urg, your lying days are
done.

You are now a figure of fun.

Perhaps you would like to take this to email? It has no place here.
Then maybe we can pick up the remnants of what used to be a good ng
before people like Alan Gould left.
--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Your comments may have been more accurate if you had added "used to be
a good newsgroup before La Puce joined in". I am sure you read the
comments of all the well respected gardeners putting her right about
matters?

If you feel that you must comment on this posting, then may I
respectfully request that you take it to email.

You really are as thick as you make out.
--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not quite so thick that I can't see what you are, everyone has been
right about you all along.

..
"Anne Jackson" wrote in message
...

Just GO AWAY, as you SAID you were doing, or take it to e-mail, or talk
through your bloody lawyers, but for crying out bloody loud GIVE US PEACE!

--
AnneJ



Not to email please.

Mike

In message om,
" writes
On Mar 10, 8:24 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message .com,
Oh for goodness sake. Get a grip. I received an email from Puce this
evening when I returned from a pleasant day out. I did not encourage
this email and furthermore am not interested in any of your bitchy
little squabbles. I am surprised to see Sacha posting 'I am sorry
June' to me and have already posted a reply to Puce's posting saying I
thought it may be a forgery. I was not addressing Sacha in my post - I
was addressing you. Are you really as thick as you make out?

As for your munificent 'benefit of the doubt' - I want nothing more to
do with you and had already kill-filed you in ukfd. Now kindly go and
get on with your life and try not to be as stupid as you make out. Just
leave me alone.

--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Really June, then it's a good job that I have kept all yoiur emails
isn''t it, you have played your last card and shown your hand, what a
miserable two faced person you are, as for killfiling me, good, I
wouldn't want to associate with anything like you,or your like you
have ben caught out, yet again and as for taking it to email, it's
pity you didn't take your own advice especially the whining email you
sent wheedling an invite to Sacha's meet, now sod off.

Ah! There we have it! Judith Lea in her true colours. Truth will out.
'Bye Judith. It was nice not knowing you.
--
June Hughes

On Mar 10, 10:50 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message om,
" writes



On Mar 10, 8:24 pm, June Hughes
wrote:
In message .com,
Oh for goodness sake. Get a grip. I received an email from Puce this
evening when I returned from a pleasant day out. I did not encourage
this email and furthermore am not interested in any of your bitchy
little squabbles. I am surprised to see Sacha posting 'I am sorry
June' to me and have already posted a reply to Puce's posting saying I
thought it may be a forgery. I was not addressing Sacha in my post - I
was addressing you. Are you really as thick as you make out?

As for your munificent 'benefit of the doubt' - I want nothing more to
do with you and had already kill-filed you in ukfd. Now kindly go and
get on with your life and try not to be as stupid as you make out. Just
leave me alone.

--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Really June, then it's a good job that I have kept all yoiur emails
isn''t it, you have played your last card and shown your hand, what a
miserable two faced person you are, as for killfiling me, good, I
wouldn't want to associate with anything like you,or your like you
have ben caught out, yet again and as for taking it to email, it's
pity you didn't take your own advice especially the whining email you
sent wheedling an invite to Sacha's meet, now sod off.

Ah! There we have it! Judith Lea in her true colours. Truth will out.
'Bye Judith. It was nice not knowing you.
--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -



Are you off somewhere? PLONK

On 10/3/07 20:14, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message .com, La
Puce writes
On 10 Mar, 14:54, Sacha wrote:
I'm sorry June but under no circumstances would I email Helene Rudlin

But you did, last sunday at 15.46 subject title 'My Family'. I didn't
responded though. Forwarded to you June.


I don't recall seeing Sacha's post of 10 March saying anything to me.
Nor do I recall posting anything requiring such a reply from her.
However, I have been out all day, so I may have missed it. (For a
start, she would not say 'I'm sorry' to me.) Looks as though the post
may be a forgery by one of the trolls like the one pretending to be
Chris.

Please remind us all for what I am supposed to say 'sorry' to you?

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

On 10/3/07 22:35, in article , "Anne
Jackson" wrote:

The message from Sacha contains these
words:

One more personal remark from you about me or my family and another
complaint about your vicious behaviour will go straight to URBED.**

This has NOTHING to do with this group!! KEEP YOUR splenetic
behaviour AWAY from here, this helps no-one, including yourself!

It has everything to do with this group because it is on this group that it
happened. It really is time for you to make up your mind, Anne. How two
faced you are! You seem to be in a most unhappy situation. On the one hand
you can't stand Puce and shout at her whenever the opportunity arises but on
the other hand, you can't stand me and ditto. Tsk. Life's just so
difficult at times, don't you find?

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)