Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A letter I agree with
Dear Sir
Fake Conservation "Conservation" must be among the most overused and ill-defined words in current buzzword vocabulary and cynically used by those who are preying on the public's concern about climate change. When one looks closely at "conservation organisations" there are very few that are not indulging in, or encouraging, environmentally damaging activities that contribute to climate change. Many are indistinguishable from the tourist industry and encourage long distance travel to their reserves and wild places, which are openly marketed as visitor attractions. In the bigger picture they are contributing to the demise of that which they purport to conserve. In 2005 a major conservation organisation told us in a news release that we were "cooking the planet" and that if we continued to do so, "will disrupt and devastate all life". But at the same time they were accepting pages of world-wide travel advertisements in their quarterly magazine - sent out to approximately a million members - which as a publication is environmentally damaging in itself by way of its production, distribution and disposal. Indeed, the Kyoto Protocol must be the biggest conservation scam ever! The UK signed up to this protocol to reduce emissions but is importing masses of produce from the emerging economies that are exempt. So in effect, all we are doing is exporting our environmental damage to the Far East by consuming products manufactured there and transported halfway across the planet. China, for example, is currently building up to sixty "dirty" power stations a year to cope with its industrial revolution, much of which is based on Western demand. I am not a conservationist or environmentalist, but I do expect those who say they are to be honest about it and be an example to the rest of us. Yours faithfully Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another letter I agree with.... | United Kingdom | |||
A letter I agree with ..Perhaps not so native. | United Kingdom | |||
A letter I agree with | United Kingdom | |||
SOUTHERN AFRICAN COUNTRIES AGREE ON GM POLICY | sci.agriculture | |||
Scientists agree world faces MASS EXTINCTIONS | alt.forestry |