Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jay jay" wrote in message ... Many thanks everyone for your replies, I think I'm beginning to get the hang of it (only took about an hour!!) I can now see the threads and am determined to hang in there. I didn't know about Outlook Express being unsecure (or is that just for the newsgroups?) but we do have very good protection so I think I'm okay there. I haven't quite got the hang of sending a reply yet - (hopeless I know!) so here I am still using Gardenbanter but I know, can do better and will do!! (BTW, I'm a she!) Many thanks again, will make make every effort so my next post is my debut as an urgler. It used to be insecure but its feeling much better now :-) Not sure why your original text has '' at the front of it though, (now changed to by me replying). In order to reply, click on 'reply group'. OE will put your cursor at the top, (IMHO the one *really** irritating thing about it). Move it down to under the text you are replying to, snipping any irrelevant stuff, then click on 'send'. (If you reply at the top a small religious war will break out with you accused of top posting :-) -- Tumbleweed *yeah yeah I'll get round to installing OE quote fix one day :-) email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tumbleweed wrote:
"jay jay" wrote in message ... [...] again, will make make every effort so my next post is my debut as an urgler. It used to be insecure but its feeling much better now :-) Not sure why your original text has '' at the front of it though, (now changed to by me replying). Had she perhaps edited a previous bit? Or am I being dense? In order to reply, click on 'reply group'. OE will put your cursor at the top, (IMHO the one *really** irritating thing about it). Move it down to under the text you are replying to, snipping any irrelevant stuff, then click on 'send'. Cursor at the top suits my style better than at the bottom, as I can run down snipping out bits. "Different strokes..." (If you reply at the top a small religious war will break out with you accused of top posting :-) Certainly will! Remember dear old Franz's uncompromising attitude on the subject? *yeah yeah I'll get round to installing OE quote fix one day I wouldn't be without QF, but I'm afraid it puts the cursor at the top too! (The default position may be configurable: I haven't looked.) Go on, click it now: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ you know you want to! -- Mike. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Lyle" wrote in message ... Tumbleweed wrote: "jay jay" wrote in message ... [...] again, will make make every effort so my next post is my debut as an urgler. It used to be insecure but its feeling much better now :-) Not sure why your original text has '' at the front of it though, (now changed to by me replying). Had she perhaps edited a previous bit? Or am I being dense? In order to reply, click on 'reply group'. OE will put your cursor at the top, (IMHO the one *really** irritating thing about it). Move it down to under the text you are replying to, snipping any irrelevant stuff, then click on 'send'. Cursor at the top suits my style better than at the bottom, as I can run down snipping out bits. "Different strokes..." (If you reply at the top a small religious war will break out with you accused of top posting :-) Certainly will! Remember dear old Franz's uncompromising attitude on the subject? *yeah yeah I'll get round to installing OE quote fix one day I wouldn't be without QF, but I'm afraid it puts the cursor at the top too! (The default position may be configurable: I haven't looked.) Go on, click it now: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ you know you want to! -- Mike. Mike that's all very good stuff but Outlook is an email client. Outlook has no built in integration with newsgroups. It would be bloody hard work using the feature to which you have linked, to make a reply to a newsgroup message. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rupert wrote:
[...] Delighted that you are persevering. Ignore all comments about Outlook which is not really related to Outlook Express. To Reply to a message: Right click on it and choose-Reply to Sender-or use the reply Button on the Toolbar across the top of your screen. I may have missed part of the thread, but I did mention Outlook, though only to say that in my experience it was _trouble-free_. I could also have mentioned, as somebody (I think it was you) did, that Outlook doesn't provide newsgroups: it's OE which does that. But JJ should note, while she has our undivided attention (and vice-versa), that it's Reply Group she wants, not Reply/Reply to Sender. The latter will generate an email, not a newsgroup message; but won't actually send it if it isn't configured for that purpose. It also automatically and annoyingly (I sometimes hit it by mistake) puts the sender into a contacts file even if you aren't using OE as an email client. For what it's worth, I always use the toolbar button, not the right-click menu. -- Mike. |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Lyle" wrote in message ... Rupert wrote: [...] Delighted that you are persevering. Ignore all comments about Outlook which is not really related to Outlook Express. To Reply to a message: Right click on it and choose-Reply to Sender-or use the reply Button on the Toolbar across the top of your screen. I may have missed part of the thread, but I did mention Outlook, though only to say that in my experience it was _trouble-free_. I could also have mentioned, as somebody (I think it was you) did, that Outlook doesn't provide newsgroups: it's OE which does that. But JJ should note, while she has our undivided attention (and vice-versa), that it's Reply Group she wants, not Reply/Reply to Sender. The latter will generate an email, not a newsgroup message; but won't actually send it if it isn't configured for that purpose. It also automatically and annoyingly (I sometimes hit it by mistake) puts the sender into a contacts file even if you aren't using OE as an email client. For what it's worth, I always use the toolbar button, not the right-click menu. -- Mike. Whoops--I did mean to say Reply to group. Suppose Jay Jay is now sufficiently confused to give it all up as a bad job. :-) |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/2/06 22:18, in article , "Rupert"
wrote: snip Delighted that you are persevering. Ignore all comments about Outlook which is not really related to Outlook Express. To Reply to a message: Right click on it and choose-Reply to Sender-or use the reply Button on the Toolbar across the top of your screen. Don't you mean Reply to Newsgroup? -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon ) |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sacha" wrote in message id... On 3/2/06 22:18, in article , "Rupert" wrote: snip Delighted that you are persevering. Ignore all comments about Outlook which is not really related to Outlook Express. To Reply to a message: Right click on it and choose-Reply to Sender-or use the reply Button on the Toolbar across the top of your screen. Don't you mean Reply to Newsgroup? -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon ) Yes I should have said "Reply to Group". Poor Jay Jay --Head must be spinning by now. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rupert wrote:
"Mike Lyle" wrote in message ... Tumbleweed wrote: "jay jay" wrote in message ... [...] again, will make make every effort so my next post is my debut as an urgler. It used to be insecure but its feeling much better now :-) Not sure why your original text has '' at the front of it though, (now changed to by me replying). Had she perhaps edited a previous bit? Or am I being dense? In order to reply, click on 'reply group'. OE will put your cursor at the top, (IMHO the one *really** irritating thing about it). Move it down to under the text you are replying to, snipping any irrelevant stuff, then click on 'send'. Cursor at the top suits my style better than at the bottom, as I can run down snipping out bits. "Different strokes..." (If you reply at the top a small religious war will break out with you accused of top posting :-) Certainly will! Remember dear old Franz's uncompromising attitude on the subject? *yeah yeah I'll get round to installing OE quote fix one day I wouldn't be without QF, but I'm afraid it puts the cursor at the top too! (The default position may be configurable: I haven't looked.) Go on, click it now: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ you know you want to! -- Mike. Mike that's all very good stuff but Outlook is an email client. Outlook has no built in integration with newsgroups. It would be bloody hard work using the feature to which you have linked, to make a reply to a newsgroup message. Wow! Poor JJ! You and I have got our wires crossed, I think. When I say "Outlook", I mean "Outlook"; I've been referring to Outlook Express as "OE". This is why I suggested somebody should give JJ a Delia recipe, starting with "If your cooker is electric, switch it on and turn the knob for the front left-hand ring to the maximum setting. If you do not know which setting this is,..." and moving by easy stages to "Put three quarters of a pint of cold tap water in a clean six-inch-wide saucepan"! I write as the man who didn't know that a Fiat oil "warning" light only came on when it was too late! You can always skip details you know, but you're up the creek if somebody assumed you would know when you don't. -- Mike. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rupert" wrote "Sacha" wrote Don't you mean Reply to Newsgroup? Yes I should have said "Reply to Group". Poor Jay Jay --Head must be spinning by now. LOL. Stick to it jay jay, you're doing fine! We all had to start somewhere. I well remember the first day I finally got internet access and Son and Heir patiently helped me set up email and newsgroup accounts. After my first lesson he finally went off to bed while I stayed up checking out the menus, options and various bells and whistles to see what was what. Suddenly all the toolbars disappeared and no matter what I tried I couldn't get them back. So long after midnight I dragged him out of bed to rescue me, which he did, still half asleep, with a couple of simple mouse-clicks and only the very slightest pitying look. ;-) -- Sue |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:57:19 -0000, "Tumbleweed"
wrote: Seconded, re Sue, and far too much 'sneering' at OE IMHO, nearly always by people who dont use it. Which sort of begs the question : What sort of person sneers at OE . . . . . . . . . . . but then goes on using it anyway ? :-) Cheers, John |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Anderton" wrote in message ... On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:57:19 -0000, "Tumbleweed" wrote: Seconded, re Sue, and far too much 'sneering' at OE IMHO, nearly always by people who dont use it. Which sort of begs the question : What sort of person sneers at OE . . . . . . . . . . . but then goes on using it anyway ? :-) Cheers, John LOL, Good point...perhaps that would have been better phrased as; "far too much 'sneering' at OE IMHO, nearly always by people who have seemingly not used it." -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tumbleweed wrote: LOL, Good point...perhaps that would have been better phrased as; "far too much 'sneering' at OE IMHO, nearly always by people who have seemingly not used it." Well, I have so far not seen much evidence in favour of that view; there is at least as much in favour of the one that there is not half enough sneering at Outlook Express. I sneer at it. I have not used it. I, however, have some evidence based on (a) the problems that people report when using it and (b) the problems that it causes to people who don't use it but are inflicted with messages emanating from it. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jay jay wrote:
up till now I've been happily accessing URG through Garden Banter, great for me, so I thought, but thanks to helpful advice on another thread I'm beginning to realise I would be better off accessing through a newsreader (newsgroup?). I have set up what I thought was the right access to URG through Outlook Express but all I get are loads of emails with no means of following a thread. It seems I might not have the right set up. (I would prefer to use Outlook Express rather than anything else) Would really appreciate some advice as to what I should do? (Apologies for not explaining myself very well - And please, the simplest piece of advice would probably be really helpful) jay jay Firstly, have you got OE set up so that you have a left-hand vertical pane ? If you have then have a look below the folders named 'Inbox' down to the 'Trash' icon. If you have nothing below there then you are not set up for newsgroups yet. You need to be set up with a newsserver which acts like your post office or magazine shop which only sends you news posts relevant to groups or interests you subscribe to. If you are subscribing to one of the main companies such as Wanadoo, they will have access to a newsserver otherwise you will generally pay a small amount for the use of a newsserver. Do a keyword search in your Service Providers search box but below is a little reading which relates to Outlook Express; http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/using/howto/oe/gettingnews.mspx Hold on a minute! Are you using the BT broadband service ? ;-) If so then you can sign up to news.btinternet.com which is what I use. Richard. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick Maclaren wrote:
In article , Tumbleweed wrote: LOL, Good point...perhaps that would have been better phrased as; "far too much 'sneering' at OE IMHO, nearly always by people who have seemingly not used it." Well, I have so far not seen much evidence in favour of that view; there is at least as much in favour of the one that there is not half enough sneering at Outlook Express. I sneer at it. I have not used it. I, however, have some evidence based on (a) the problems that people report when using it and (b) the problems that it causes to people who don't use it but are inflicted with messages emanating from it. I both use and sneer. The former because it's perfectly safe for simple Usenet, and comes from the same house as most of the rest of my system. The latter because it has a long-standing reputation among the cognoscenti (of whom I can no longer claim to be one, if I ever was) for insecurity. It's an older-generation product, and has been left at a relatively early stage of development; and because it comes bundled with the majority of the world's desktop operating systems, it is together with IE a prime target for malefactors (if anybody wants to find out a bit more, it's easy enough, but I'm not about to help!). - Mike, happily using OE+n.i.n.+QuoteFix for newsgroups. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[IBC] Fw: Outlook Express Crashes | Bonsai | |||
accessing urg through outlook express | United Kingdom | |||
OT - posts missing on outlook express | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
[IBC] FW: [IBC] Fw: Outlook Express Crashes | Bonsai | |||
[IBC] FW: [IBC] Fw: Outlook Express Crashes | Bonsai |