Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
My question is who has the final say on whether or not the fence is
replaced? Most deeds have some wording to the effect of "land and all improvements". The fence is an improvement and therefore belongs to the property that it sits on. Gary Brady Austin, TX |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
Usually the original installation of a wooden fence has the smooth side
towards the house that installed and who's property it was installed on. "Dave" wrote in message ... "J Kolenovsky" wrote in message Brian Anderson's answers were good. I'd persue. IF your neighbor does replace it, can you lay your trellis and vines face down on the ground during construction and then raise it back up afterwards? That's actually my backup plan if he does replace the fence, but at this point I'm not too excited about tearing up my yard and messing with everything if I have any say in it. -D |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
That's not always true. Many people put the smooth side out for aesthetic reasons, and to
prevent people climbing on the wood members to get over the fence. In our area, one side faces in, one out. It definitely doesn't declare property lines. If it does, I can tear down my neighbors fence today. Of course I won't, but I can. On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:36:28 GMT, "John" opined: Usually the original installation of a wooden fence has the smooth side towards the house that installed and who's property it was installed on. "Dave" wrote in message ... "J Kolenovsky" wrote in message Brian Anderson's answers were good. I'd persue. IF your neighbor does replace it, can you lay your trellis and vines face down on the ground during construction and then raise it back up afterwards? That's actually my backup plan if he does replace the fence, but at this point I'm not too excited about tearing up my yard and messing with everything if I have any say in it. -D |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
animaux wrote:
That's not always true. Many people put the smooth side out for aesthetic reasons, and to Why would anybody want the pretty side to face out? I'd rather enjoy the pretty side myself. prevent people climbing on the wood members to get over the fence. In our area, one side faces in, one out. It definitely doesn't declare property lines. If it does, I can tear down my neighbors fence today. Of course I won't, but I can. When we installed our privacy fence after buying our house, it was most definitely place on our side of the property line and with the pretty side facing in, where we can enjoy it. -- Victor Martinez Send your spam he Email me he |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:41:36 GMT, Victor Martinez opined:
Why would anybody want the pretty side to face out? I'd rather enjoy the pretty side myself. Oh, honey chile, I agree! You're not thinking sub-dividge. We went to the Shambala Meditation Center on S. 5th St. today, and every house had something different. That's what I love. Everyone living in harmony, different, but same in their differences. When we installed our privacy fence after buying our house, it was most definitely place on our side of the property line and with the pretty side facing in, where we can enjoy it. Hey, if we bought a house in town, or not in a sub-division, we'd have cattle fencing. I actually love the way that looks and it also gives me a vertical space to grow more vines. I adore vines, but there's only so much fence! V |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
In article , Victor Martinez
wrote: Why would anybody want the pretty side to face out? I'd rather enjoy the pretty side myself. Victor Martinez I think fence etiquette demands the pretty side (of a wood fence that has a good and bad side) faces the neighbour - it is a neighbourly gesture. In some places the city, subdivivision etc. has guidelines. I do no think Austin code has formal guidelines on this (it constrains height to 6 ft under most circumstances). E.g. http://www.americanfenceassociation....bbthreadid=104 http://www.cityofnormandy.com/fenceregulations.htm Roland |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:42:03 -0600, (Joe Doe)
wrote: In article , Victor Martinez wrote: Why would anybody want the pretty side to face out? I'd rather enjoy the pretty side myself. I think fence etiquette demands the pretty side (of a wood fence that has a good and bad side) faces the neighbour And I have a whole lot more neighbors than I have of me! Also, I can stand on the runners and look over the fence to see what is happening. I vote for the runners' side facing in to my house. Rusty Mase ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
Joe Doe wrote:
I think fence etiquette demands the pretty side (of a wood fence that has a good and bad side) faces the neighbour - it is a neighbourly gesture. I disagree. It's my fence, it's my money, *I* will enjoy it. In some places the city, subdivivision etc. has guidelines. I do no think I am so happy I don't live in generica... -- Victor Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam he Email me he |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 21:58:01 -0600, Rusty Mase opined:
And I have a whole lot more neighbors than I have of me! Also, I can stand on the runners and look over the fence to see what is happening. I vote for the runners' side facing in to my house. Rusty Mase Actually, the sides which have runners have been updated by the use of rebar mesh sold in giant rolls. We put that all along the fences between us and the neighbors. We nailed it up to make it two feet taller than then fence so when the vines cover it, we will not be able to see them, nor they us. For us that means I won't have to look at 5 sheds, and all manner of yunk including a trampoline, swing sets in garish colors and children jumping on said trampoline which is right up against the fence. When we take a nice hot tub, we don't want children talking to us, thank you! V |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:41:21 GMT, Victor Martinez opined:
I am so happy I don't live in generica... Yes, you are lucky. Downtown is so great, such diversity. People truly express themselves in town. I feel so lucky to have selected Austin and the area to make our home. I could not have planned it better than it is. On the other hand, my mother lives on the Atlantic Ocean on the east end of Long Island (where it is breathtaking and the nesting cite of osprey), but I don't know that I could go back up to the 21 inches of snow she got three days ago. Brrrrr is what I say at 70! V |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:07:02 GMT, animaux
wrote: Actually, the sides which have runners have been updated by the use of rebar mesh I like the runner side of the fence inside as you can add benches and trellises to the posts and runners. Also, security is somewhat better as it is harder to climb the runnerless side. Thus it is harder to get in your yard than it is to get out. Rusty Mase ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:07:02 GMT, animaux
wrote: Actually, the sides which have runners have been updated by the use of rebar mesh I like the runner side of the fence inside as you can add benches and trellises to the posts and runners. Also, security is somewhat better as it is harder to climb the runnerless side. Thus it is harder to get in your yard than it is to get out. Rusty Mase ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:07:02 GMT, animaux
wrote: Actually, the sides which have runners have been updated by the use of rebar mesh I like the runner side of the fence inside as you can add benches and trellises to the posts and runners. Also, security is somewhat better as it is harder to climb the runnerless side. Thus it is harder to get in your yard than it is to get out. Rusty Mase ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:51:43 -0600, Rusty Mase opined:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:07:02 GMT, animaux wrote: Actually, the sides which have runners have been updated by the use of rebar mesh I like the runner side of the fence inside as you can add benches and trellises to the posts and runners. Also, security is somewhat better as it is harder to climb the runnerless side. Thus it is harder to get in your yard than it is to get out. Rusty Mase Yes, this is my reason also. I can understand why someone would want the smooth side in, especially if the gardens in question are more formal, or have a partaire (sp?) or a more organized border. My garden is rather wild and completely for wildlife, mostly birds and my fish. Speaking of the fish, we bought four, twenty five cent fish two years ago, and now those goldfish are a foot long! This spring we will have to enlarge the pond for them. Shhhhh, don't tell Mark! Victoria |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Fence Rights
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:51:43 -0600, Rusty Mase opined:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:07:02 GMT, animaux wrote: Actually, the sides which have runners have been updated by the use of rebar mesh I like the runner side of the fence inside as you can add benches and trellises to the posts and runners. Also, security is somewhat better as it is harder to climb the runnerless side. Thus it is harder to get in your yard than it is to get out. Rusty Mase Yes, this is my reason also. I can understand why someone would want the smooth side in, especially if the gardens in question are more formal, or have a partaire (sp?) or a more organized border. My garden is rather wild and completely for wildlife, mostly birds and my fish. Speaking of the fish, we bought four, twenty five cent fish two years ago, and now those goldfish are a foot long! This spring we will have to enlarge the pond for them. Shhhhh, don't tell Mark! Victoria |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FBI SADISM, PERVERSION, MENTAL TORTURE and BLATANT human rights violations | Ponds | |||
naming rights | Gardening | |||
Anonymous for Animal Rights | United Kingdom | |||
Can someone please explain "Propagation Rights?" | Gardening | |||
Bill of No Rights | Ponds |