Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which rights for which animals? (was: problem with this newsgroup)
the fact that the Party was not a hereditary body did a
great deal to neutralize opposition. The older kind of Socialist, who had been trained to fight against something called 'class privilege' assumed that what is not hereditary cannot be permanent. He did not see that the continuity of an oligarchy need not be physical, nor did he pause to reflect that hereditary aristocracies have always been shortlived, whereas adoptive organizations such as the Catholic Church have sometimes lasted for hundreds or thousands of years. The essence of oligarchical rule is not father-to-son inheritance, but the persistence of a certain world-view and a certain way of life, imposed by the dead upon the living. A ruling group is a ruling group so long as it can nominate its successors. The Party is not concerned with perpetuating its blood but with perpetuating itself. Who wields power is not important, provided that the hierarchical structure remains always the same. All the beliefs, habits, tastes, emotions, mental attitudes that characterize our time are really designed to sustain the mystique of the Party and prevent the true nature of present-day society from being perceived. Physical rebellion, or any preliminary move t |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which rights for which animals? (was: problem with this newsgroup) | Ponds | |||
Why is there so much animal rights post in this newsgroup ? | United Kingdom | |||
using foraging animals as lawnmower substitutes; return to having animals around every home | Plant Science | |||
Animals which spread the seeds of Cascabela Thevetia | Plant Science | |||
Bill of No Rights | Ponds |