Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
3rd RFD: rec.ponds.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS)
On 3 Mar 2007 03:52:59 -0800, "Nekojin" wrote:
I say: You don't have to own a pond or anything to be in this discussion. The moderators are well aware of the problems and think they have taken adequate steps to address them. such as? Wetware. I go on to say: We feel that moderation on content only will be sufficient to stifle the noise yet keep as open as possible a discussion. And yet look at NGP Carol slip right through their moderation process and attacked a poster, pretending to be on topic. Can you please inform us, on how you guys are planning to avoid her from doing this on RPM? Face it Galen, Carol been causing problems on news groups for 12 years. First on the health groups, then on the religion groups, and now the ponds groups. You are guys are creating a moderated group because of the backlash of her behavior, and now you are creating a heaven for her to continue. You've seen it. All of you are rewarding her action and her and bigotry. If you create a group and allow her to continue you also agree with her persecution of Jehovah's witnesses every where. Is that the message you guys are conveying? Perhaps we have different opinions about what moderation is to accomplish. It is not flawless, nor do the moderators expect it to be. Misteaks will be made. Posts that should obviously be approved will be rejected, and posts that should obviously be rejected will be approved. I may go to my grave deeply regretting one or more decisions I have made. Then again, I'll bet I can get over it, given time. Someone may even slip through a message attacking my dear, departed, sainted mother. They probably won't be able to do it twice, however. They certainly won't be able to make a habit of it. (On second thought, they might, I *am* pretty stupid.) So if you're expecting moderation to provide some kind of impenetrable gateway, I concede already, it just isn't going to happen that way. -- Galen Hekhuis We'll cross that bridge when it rears its ugly head |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
3rd RFD: rec.ponds.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS)
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 10:24:51 -0600, "Reel McKoi"
wrote: snip .. Putting it as nicely as possible - it's not the moderators business what people do elsewhere anyway. Funny how carol insists others are to be held responsibvle for what they do away from a given group yet just like her other views these rules and statements mnever seem to apply to her in any shape form or fashion. How hipocritical of her to think that way.....then again its amazing she can even think half assed being that she is nnothing but a dancing moron held up by strings and controlled by Tristan and a few others...........haahahaaaaahaaaaaahaaaa Carol Gulley the dancing Granny puppet! Ya know I would never have thought a puppet could be a moron! But you seen it right here with carol gulley folks! Puppets can be morons! ------- I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|