Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We discussed the proper spelling of this name on APBO the other day, so I
figured I'd ask Julian Shaw what he thought. Here's his response: Thank you for your e-mail query. The plant in question was named by Hooker in Curtis's Botanical Magazine vol. 54: t. 2748 in 1827, as Zygopetalum mackaii. This spelling is followed in several botanical works as you have indicated. A number of other works use the spelling mackayi, including; Pabst, Orchidaceae Brazilienses 2: 283, #1745 (1977), Pridgeon, Illust. Encyc. Orchids 290 (1992). Warren & Miller, Orchids of the high mountain rainforest... SE Brazil, 133, #1745 (1994). McQueen, Orchids of Brazil 192 (1993) The ICBN 60.1 states that 'The original spelling of a name or epithet is to be retained, except for the correction of typographical or orthographical errors and the standardizations imposed by ... Art. 60.11.' And Art. 60.11 tells us to look at Rec. 60.C.1., where under (a) we can find the example gray-i for Gray. From this I would infer that mackaii, should be corrected to mackayi, as it is formed from the name Mackay. In the Orchid Hybrid Register, we currently treat mackaii as a synonym of mackayi. However, I think it would be wise to seek a second opinion on this, so I will copy this e-mail to my colleague Alan Leslie who has greater experience in these sort of questions. Best regards Julian Shaw RHS Orchid Registrar |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kathy,
Interesting. I am also in an email conversation with another orchid expert (since he didn't reply publicly, I am going to refrain from names for now) about this, and will have a report shortly. -Eric in SF www.orchidphotos.org "K Barrett" wrote in message ... We discussed the proper spelling of this name on APBO the other day, so I figured I'd ask Julian Shaw what he thought. Here's his response: |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:12:55 -0800, "K Barrett"
wrote: We discussed the proper spelling of this name on APBO the other day, so I figured I'd ask Julian Shaw what he thought. Here's his response: Thank you for your e-mail query. The plant in question was named by Hooker in Curtis's Botanical Magazine vol. 54: t. 2748 in 1827, as Zygopetalum mackaii. This spelling is followed in several botanical works as you have indicated. A number of other works use the spelling mackayi, including; Pabst, Orchidaceae Brazilienses 2: 283, #1745 (1977), Pridgeon, Illust. Encyc. Orchids 290 (1992). Warren & Miller, Orchids of the high mountain rainforest... SE Brazil, 133, #1745 (1994). McQueen, Orchids of Brazil 192 (1993) The ICBN 60.1 states that 'The original spelling of a name or epithet is to be retained, except for the correction of typographical or orthographical errors and the standardizations imposed by ... Art. 60.11.' And Art. 60.11 tells us to look at Rec. 60.C.1., where under (a) we can find the example gray-i for Gray. From this I would infer that mackaii, should be corrected to mackayi, as it is formed from the name Mackay. In the Orchid Hybrid Register, we currently treat mackaii as a synonym of mackayi. However, I think it would be wise to seek a second opinion on this, so I will copy this e-mail to my colleague Alan Leslie who has greater experience in these sort of questions. Best regards Julian Shaw RHS Orchid Registrar Nice quick response and very detailed explanation. Not like many given to us who are not taxonomic experts. SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/albums.php |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks ever so much Kathy, you're a trooper.
I will keep my tags as they are Z. mackayi & add mackaii as a syn. -- Cheers Wendy Remove PETERPAN for email reply K Barrett wrote: We discussed the proper spelling of this name on APBO the other day, so I figured I'd ask Julian Shaw what he thought. Here's his response: Thank you for your e-mail query. The plant in question was named by Hooker in Curtis's Botanical Magazine vol. 54: t. 2748 in 1827, as Zygopetalum mackaii. This spelling is followed in several botanical works as you have indicated. A number of other works use the spelling mackayi, including; Pabst, Orchidaceae Brazilienses 2: 283, #1745 (1977), Pridgeon, Illust. Encyc. Orchids 290 (1992). Warren & Miller, Orchids of the high mountain rainforest... SE Brazil, 133, #1745 (1994). McQueen, Orchids of Brazil 192 (1993) The ICBN 60.1 states that 'The original spelling of a name or epithet is to be retained, except for the correction of typographical or orthographical errors and the standardizations imposed by ... Art. 60.11.' And Art. 60.11 tells us to look at Rec. 60.C.1., where under (a) we can find the example gray-i for Gray. From this I would infer that mackaii, should be corrected to mackayi, as it is formed from the name Mackay. In the Orchid Hybrid Register, we currently treat mackaii as a synonym of mackayi. However, I think it would be wise to seek a second opinion on this, so I will copy this e-mail to my colleague Alan Leslie who has greater experience in these sort of questions. Best regards Julian Shaw RHS Orchid Registrar |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zygo triste 'Deni' closeup | Orchid Photos | |||
Z mackayi | Orchids | |||
Attn Zygo growers | Orchids | |||
Zygo mackayi again | Orchids | |||
Zygopetalum mackayi bloom time? | Orchids |