Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the most gorgeous Phal. It has bloomed for more than four
months. The flowers are just now starting to fade. I understand that it will bloom again in about six months? I have been feeding it at every watering per instructions on orchid food jar. Something like 1/8 tsn fertilizer to 1 quart water. Do I continue to fertilize even when it isn't blooming? Do I cut off the flower spikes when the blooms are gone? As you can tell, I know next to nothing about orchids except that I think I'm hooked and will be buying a few more soon. Thanks Jane |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you leave the spike alone it might develop more flowers from the tip or a
side shoot. It might die back to a side node and then branch and develop more flowers. It might die back all the way to the plant or it might sit there and do nothing for months and then start to grow and bloom again when a new spike forms, (yellows tend to do this more often than others.) For cosmetic reasons you can remove the spike all the way down to within a 1/4 to 1/2 an inch from the plant if you want, even before it dies naturally. You might be able to trick the old spike into branching and producing more blooms by cutting it just above a node. Usually the first or second node down, just below where the first flower formed is the best place to try this trick. It must be done soon after the last flower fades. It usually works best on large whites or pinks. You really don't need to do anything differently now that it is done blooming that you should not have already been doing. The number one reason why the plant will grow but not bloom again within about a year is lack of sufficient light levels. It wants very bright light but no direct sun. The number two reason why it will grow but fail to bloom is insufficient fertilizer levels, so keep fertilizing according to the fertilizer's label direction EXCEPT, every three or four waterings use water only and really flush it through the pot to remove any fertilizer salts that may be building up in the potting media over time. Now that it is done blooming it might be a good time to check the root health below the potting media surface and potting media itself to see if it is time to repot. wrote in message oups.com... I have the most gorgeous Phal. It has bloomed for more than four months. The flowers are just now starting to fade. I understand that it will bloom again in about six months? I have been feeding it at every watering per instructions on orchid food jar. Something like 1/8 tsn fertilizer to 1 quart water. Do I continue to fertilize even when it isn't blooming? Do I cut off the flower spikes when the blooms are gone? As you can tell, I know next to nothing about orchids except that I think I'm hooked and will be buying a few more soon. Thanks Jane |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wait until the flower spike turns yellow/brown & dried out before I
cut it off. Then I know it's not going to make more flowers on the same stem. I have 2 kinds of fertilizer, the first being an ordinary Schultz regular-plant fertilizer, which was all I had for ages here in the middle of nowhere, & they did fine with it... & the 2nd is a Schultz orchid fertilizer which is supposed to encourage bloom. This is probably pretty amateur, but if it starts making a new leaf after it blooms, I fertilize with the regular stuff for a while, then the orchid stuff after the leaf gets to be a good size. Often they will make a leaf or 2, then another spike, but I have had some start new spikes right away before the old one has turned completely brown. I figure that means they have enough leaves & are just ready to bloom again. So it might not take 6 months for yours to rebloom. I don't fertilize every time; you can get a buildup of salts from too much fertilizer. As well as good light, I am under the impression phals also need a temperature drop at night to bloom, although not as fussy as some orchids. So if yours is on a windowsill that gets cooler at night, that might help too. The more experienced growers here can probably give you more scientific advice than me & set any of my errors right too. Yes, they are addictive. I started with "just one" some years ago, & now have 16 orchids; the only reason I don't have more is that I literally have no more windowsill space. The last remaining spot belongs to the kitty ![]() Good luck with it. Alison |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you are able to dig up a copy of the June 2004 (I think that was the
date) "Orchids" magazine, there is an article by Dr. Bill Argo of Blackmore Co. and a horticulturalist at MSU about a study that basically proved that "Bloom Boosters" are unnecessary, and in my opinion, wasteful. Their conclusion was that excessive nitrogen was the reason for slow- or non-blooming orchids, and it was the diluting effect of the extra phosphorus in the so-called bloom boosters that helped, not the extra P itself. Plants really only need a tiny amount of phosphorus, so all of the extra is lost into the soil and groundwater. Based upon their study, they found that a steady diet of a moderate-nitrogen concentration was far more effective than was the use of bloom boosters, and they developed fertilizer formulas accordingly. Basically, for a general collection, they found that a complete formula fertilizer - one containing a vast array of macro-, minor-, and trace elements, if fed at about 100 - 150 ppm N regularly, was highly effective. I switched to their formula over two years ago, use it at 125 ppm N at ___EVERY___ watering, and my plants are doing great. By the way, if you divide 10 by the % N in the fertilizer formula, it tells you the teaspoons per gallon for about 125 ppm N, so if you round up or down a bit for convenience, you're still in the range. One last comment - watering first, then fertilizing is a waste. Doing so saturates the velamen with pure water, greatly reducing the absorption of nutrients from the fertilizer solution, and it was a methodology concocted when it was common to feed infrequently and heavily, yet preventing burning of the roots. Feeding regularly and in a more dilute concentration is far safer and in my opinion, more closely replicates natural conditions. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Artwork, Books and Lots of Free Info! wrote in message oups.com... I wait until the flower spike turns yellow/brown & dried out before I cut it off. Then I know it's not going to make more flowers on the same stem. I have 2 kinds of fertilizer, the first being an ordinary Schultz regular-plant fertilizer, which was all I had for ages here in the middle of nowhere, & they did fine with it... & the 2nd is a Schultz orchid fertilizer which is supposed to encourage bloom. This is probably pretty amateur, but if it starts making a new leaf after it blooms, I fertilize with the regular stuff for a while, then the orchid stuff after the leaf gets to be a good size. Often they will make a leaf or 2, then another spike, but I have had some start new spikes right away before the old one has turned completely brown. I figure that means they have enough leaves & are just ready to bloom again. So it might not take 6 months for yours to rebloom. I don't fertilize every time; you can get a buildup of salts from too much fertilizer. As well as good light, I am under the impression phals also need a temperature drop at night to bloom, although not as fussy as some orchids. So if yours is on a windowsill that gets cooler at night, that might help too. The more experienced growers here can probably give you more scientific advice than me & set any of my errors right too. Yes, they are addictive. I started with "just one" some years ago, & now have 16 orchids; the only reason I don't have more is that I literally have no more windowsill space. The last remaining spot belongs to the kitty ![]() Good luck with it. Alison |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's interesting. I suppose it explains why some of my orchids were
blooming fine with the regular 10-15-10. It's liquid, & the box says 7 drops per litre, & I've been using it at half strength, but not every watering -- rather every other, or every when-I-have-time. A couple others have bloomed since I started using the 19-31-17 orchid fertilizer (is this enough P to count as a bloom booster?); but the potinara may just be getting to blooming size anyway. The ascocentrum, however, put up 2 spikes instead of the 1 it's been making erratically since I got it. Thanks also for explaining about watering first. I thought you had to do that, precisely because of the root-burning problem. I will change my method, & it will take less time ![]() Alison |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. Maybe I should have mentioned, it's growing a new leaf right
now. Al wrote: If you leave the spike alone it might develop more flowers from the tip or a side shoot. It might die back to a side node and then branch and develop more flowers. It might die back all the way to the plant or it might sit there and do nothing for months and then start to grow and bloom again when a new spike forms, (yellows tend to do this more often than others.) For cosmetic reasons you can remove the spike all the way down to within a 1/4 to 1/2 an inch from the plant if you want, even before it dies naturally. You might be able to trick the old spike into branching and producing more blooms by cutting it just above a node. Usually the first or second node down, just below where the first flower formed is the best place to try this trick. It must be done soon after the last flower fades. It usually works best on large whites or pinks. You really don't need to do anything differently now that it is done blooming that you should not have already been doing. The number one reason why the plant will grow but not bloom again within about a year is lack of sufficient light levels. It wants very bright light but no direct sun. The number two reason why it will grow but fail to bloom is insufficient fertilizer levels, so keep fertilizing according to the fertilizer's label direction EXCEPT, every three or four waterings use water only and really flush it through the pot to remove any fertilizer salts that may be building up in the potting media over time. Now that it is done blooming it might be a good time to check the root health below the potting media surface and potting media itself to see if it is time to repot. wrote in message oups.com... I have the most gorgeous Phal. It has bloomed for more than four months. The flowers are just now starting to fade. I understand that it will bloom again in about six months? I have been feeding it at every watering per instructions on orchid food jar. Something like 1/8 tsn fertilizer to 1 quart water. Do I continue to fertilize even when it isn't blooming? Do I cut off the flower spikes when the blooms are gone? As you can tell, I know next to nothing about orchids except that I think I'm hooked and will be buying a few more soon. Thanks Jane |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray, great tip on the 10 divided by. Growmore Orchid 20-20-20 calls for one
teaspoon per gallon of water every 10 to 14 days. Label also calls for pre-watering of dry plants. Looks to me like a label that will get you into trouble in the winter. If you are using city or well water do not be in any hurry to throw away your tub of "Bloom Booster". Argo may have shown that the extra P does not improve flowering, but in my opinion he does not address their real benefit. The 'hardness' in city and well water will slowly concentrate in the potting mix driving the mix pH up. To combat this growers will acidify their water or periodically do an acid drench with weak phosphoric, citric, or sulfuric acid. "Bloom Boosters" elevate their phosphorus by adding extra phosphoric acid and thus they are a convenient way for the small grower to fight 'hardness' buildup. For many growers, the use of a "bloom booster" every 4 to 8 weeks will help keep the media pH in the ideal range. If you are using RO or very clear water, throw away that tub of "Bloom Booster", the extra phosphoric acid is likely to get you in trouble. Pat Brennan "Ray" wrote in message . .. If you are able to dig up a copy of the June 2004 (I think that was the date) "Orchids" magazine, there is an article by Dr. Bill Argo of Blackmore Co. and a horticulturalist at MSU about a study that basically proved that "Bloom Boosters" are unnecessary, and in my opinion, wasteful. Their conclusion was that excessive nitrogen was the reason for slow- or non-blooming orchids, and it was the diluting effect of the extra phosphorus in the so-called bloom boosters that helped, not the extra P itself. Plants really only need a tiny amount of phosphorus, so all of the extra is lost into the soil and groundwater. Based upon their study, they found that a steady diet of a moderate-nitrogen concentration was far more effective than was the use of bloom boosters, and they developed fertilizer formulas accordingly. Basically, for a general collection, they found that a complete formula fertilizer - one containing a vast array of macro-, minor-, and trace elements, if fed at about 100 - 150 ppm N regularly, was highly effective. I switched to their formula over two years ago, use it at 125 ppm N at ___EVERY___ watering, and my plants are doing great. By the way, if you divide 10 by the % N in the fertilizer formula, it tells you the teaspoons per gallon for about 125 ppm N, so if you round up or down a bit for convenience, you're still in the range. One last comment - watering first, then fertilizing is a waste. Doing so saturates the velamen with pure water, greatly reducing the absorption of nutrients from the fertilizer solution, and it was a methodology concocted when it was common to feed infrequently and heavily, yet preventing burning of the roots. Feeding regularly and in a more dilute concentration is far safer and in my opinion, more closely replicates natural conditions. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Artwork, Books and Lots of Free Info! wrote in message oups.com... I wait until the flower spike turns yellow/brown & dried out before I cut it off. Then I know it's not going to make more flowers on the same stem. I have 2 kinds of fertilizer, the first being an ordinary Schultz regular-plant fertilizer, which was all I had for ages here in the middle of nowhere, & they did fine with it... & the 2nd is a Schultz orchid fertilizer which is supposed to encourage bloom. This is probably pretty amateur, but if it starts making a new leaf after it blooms, I fertilize with the regular stuff for a while, then the orchid stuff after the leaf gets to be a good size. Often they will make a leaf or 2, then another spike, but I have had some start new spikes right away before the old one has turned completely brown. I figure that means they have enough leaves & are just ready to bloom again. So it might not take 6 months for yours to rebloom. I don't fertilize every time; you can get a buildup of salts from too much fertilizer. As well as good light, I am under the impression phals also need a temperature drop at night to bloom, although not as fussy as some orchids. So if yours is on a windowsill that gets cooler at night, that might help too. The more experienced growers here can probably give you more scientific advice than me & set any of my errors right too. Yes, they are addictive. I started with "just one" some years ago, & now have 16 orchids; the only reason I don't have more is that I literally have no more windowsill space. The last remaining spot belongs to the kitty ![]() Good luck with it. Alison |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about fertilizing | Gardening | |||
Fertilizing Question | Gardening | |||
Fertilizing question for veg garden | Edible Gardening | |||
Fertilizing question | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Fertilizing question | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |