http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...=t0%3Aih%3A710



SEC. 405. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

(a) Civil Sanctions-

(1) CIVIL PENALTY-

(A) IN GENERAL- Any person that commits an act that violates the food safety law (including a regulation promulgated or
order issued under the food safety law) may be assessed a civil penalty by the Administrator of not more than $1,000,000
for each such act.

(B) SEPARATE OFFENSE- Each act described in subparagraph (A) and each day during which that act continues shall be
considered a separate offense.


so, by not putting chemicals into your garden, it will be possible to be fined $1,000,000. if you grow an edible plant
on your property the argument could easily be made that you are technically under this jurisdiction. THis is what the
bill states and you can bet $1,000,001 that Monsato (or whoever else Rosa Delauris is bending over for) will pay for the
legal cases against any little person who challenges this.





http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...=t0%3Aih%3A836

SEC. 506. REGULATIONS.

The Administrator may promulgate such regulations as the Administrator determines are necessary or appropriate to
perform the duties of the Administrator.

"We'll take any measure what so ever to ensure that you are putting chemicals into your garden."




what in this bill ISN'T good for Monsanto? The fact that the company with which Stanley Greenburg is paid from Monsanto
to represent, will also be paid to sway the opinion of the advisory committee. So if the congress woman's husband is
taking kickbacks from Monsato (but not "working" for them) - you can bet that she too is receiving generous benefits
too, and America will become a dictatorship giving one guy (or the way the money flows) control over what any American
is allowed to grow and eat.



Val wrote:
Stanley Greenburg http://www.gqrr.com/index.php?ID=403 isn't an employee of
Monsanto