Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
Hi all, I recently purchased a variety of tropical seeds from the
Biodome in Montreal. I'm considering purchasing an acapulco unit: http://www.summertan.com/Catalog/aca..._2543832. htm Apparently the relevant information about this unit is that it is a 800 Watt UV Tanning Lamp. Would this be a good source of light for some plants that I'm growing from seeds? Are there cheaper (less than 400 dollars with tax included) and/or better sources that I should look at? Thanks, Tim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
In article says...
No, plants are subject to sunburn as well as humans. Get HID lamp, either metal halide or high pressure sodium. You can get bulbs in a variety of spectrums for special needs, look at http://www.altgarden.com/index.html for some more info and products. Yikes, the pricing on that site is complicated! Last year I bought a 400W HPS Econogrow system from this place http://www.hydroponics.net/ and it worked out pretty well. In the Econogrow system the ballast sits on the floor away from the light. According to the specs a 400W light covers a 4ft x 4ft area which was good enough for my needs. Anything higher the electric bills start taking their toll. A UV tanning lamp is a no-no. That's true. I have a florescent setup for vegetative growth plants using regular ballasts and 40W bulbs from Home Depot. I'd go with Metal Halide but I heard they can be a PITA to maintain. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
I didn't know marjjiiuanna was a tropical plant!
Now you can't say that any more!!! "Tightwad" wrote in message ... wrote: Hi all, I recently purchased a variety of tropical seeds from the Biodome in Montreal. I'm considering purchasing an acapulco unit: http://www.summertan.com/Catalog/aca..._2543832. htm I didn't know marjjiiuanna was a tropical plant! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
Hi Tim,
You can take an ordinary shop lamp fluorescent fixture and buy inexpensive grow light fluorescent bulbs at a garden center or home improvement center and they will work perfectly ok. Some people even forgo the grow light bulbs and use ordinary fluorescent bulbs, but I think you get better results with possibly a mixture of the two, to cover the complete spectrum of light that plants need. Don't waste your money on this UV Tanning Lamp, which may have the incorrect light spectrum for raising plants. Sherwin D. wrote: Hi all, I recently purchased a variety of tropical seeds from the Biodome in Montreal. I'm considering purchasing an acapulco unit: http://www.summertan.com/Catalog/aca..._2543832. htm Apparently the relevant information about this unit is that it is a 800 Watt UV Tanning Lamp. Would this be a good source of light for some plants that I'm growing from seeds? Are there cheaper (less than 400 dollars with tax included) and/or better sources that I should look at? Thanks, Tim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
I have been growing "Tropical Plants" for decades under good old "shop
lights". Normally with one cool white and one warm white tube per fixture; for flowering plants I might add the special wide spectrum tube. If the particular set up has 2 double tube fixtures, I place the W-S tube so they are in the center and one warm and one cool at either end. W-S tubes are not necessary for starting and growing seeds and seedlings. I do keep the fixtures fairly close to the tops of the seedlings, 2-inches seems to work best.. To reflect the light back onto all parts of the plants/seedlings I hang the silver Mylar coated "Survival Blankets" on three sides of the plant stand, leaving the top open for heat escape.. The front can also be draped with these survival blankets or you can use clear plastic, but I have found this impedes air circulation and can get the area too warm causing the potting mix to dry out too quickly. I have grown and flowered just about everything fromAfrican Violets to Zygo-cactus under this set-up with great results. Hemma |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
The UV tanning light is a danger to your eyes your skin and your
plants. Look for something else wrote: Hi all, I recently purchased a variety of tropical seeds from the Biodome in Montreal. I'm considering purchasing an acapulco unit: http://www.summertan.com/Catalog/aca..._2543832. htm Apparently the relevant information about this unit is that it is a 800 Watt UV Tanning Lamp. Would this be a good source of light for some plants that I'm growing from seeds? Are there cheaper (less than 400 dollars with tax included) and/or better sources that I should look at? Thanks, Tim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
Mark Anderson wrote:
That's true. I have a florescent setup for vegetative growth plants using regular ballasts and 40W bulbs from Home Depot. I'd go with Metal Halide but I heard they can be a PITA to maintain. No problem at all. You have to change the bulb once a year or so. And you can get bulbs from HD, since they are used as warehouse lights and such. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
Mark Anderson writes in article t dated Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:02:59 -0500:
That's true. I have a florescent setup for vegetative growth plants using regular ballasts and 40W bulbs from Home Depot. I'd go with Metal Halide but I heard they can be a PITA to maintain. Are streetlights and security lights a PITA to maintain? They are normally metal halide. -- spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
Spud Demon wrote:
Mark Anderson writes in article t dated Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:02:59 -0500: That's true. I have a florescent setup for vegetative growth plants using regular ballasts and 40W bulbs from Home Depot. I'd go with Metal Halide but I heard they can be a PITA to maintain. Are streetlights and security lights a PITA to maintain? They are normally metal halide. HPS security lights are very easy to maintain. MH have to be relamped fairly frequently and so cost a lot more to operate. Fluorescent T8 lamps on good electronic ballasts are the most economical light source. Plants seem to really like the 3000K lamps. For lighting a room for growing plants, I'd recommend a 400W HPS security light, supplemented with movable F32T8 fluorescents. I haven't had much luck with just HPS by itself, but HPS worked better than MH once the MH lamps were more than just a few months old. Best regards, Bob |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
Mark Anderson wrote:
In article says... That's true. I have a florescent setup for vegetative growth plants using regular ballasts and 40W bulbs from Home Depot. I'd go with Metal Halide but I heard they can be a PITA to maintain. No problem at all. You have to change the bulb once a year or so. And you can get bulbs from HD, since they are used as warehouse lights and such. I read that the MH bulb's color spectrum shifts fairly quickly which you can't see with your naked eye. I debated with myself between HPS and MH but chose HPS for stability. The plants in my living room are growing just fine under a 250W MH lamp. You can spend more $$ and get a MH with a different spectrum, even up to 5000K or so. They are commonly used by reef aquarist, who are much more concerned about spectra. But yes, changing the bulbs on a routine schedule, like yearly, is better than waiting for them to burn out. But the HPS is a red spectrum flowering light so some plants didn't do so well under it last winter. However, it might be worthwhile to get one of each and run the MH light from November to January or February and then the HPS light from January to planting outside time. I'm still learning about it. There are advanced tech bulbs, like http://www.altgarden.com/site/bulbs/page1hps.html designed for better spectrum, and better growing. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
John Hines wrote:
Mark Anderson wrote: In article says... That's true. I have a florescent setup for vegetative growth plants using regular ballasts and 40W bulbs from Home Depot. I'd go with Metal Halide but I heard they can be a PITA to maintain. No problem at all. You have to change the bulb once a year or so. And you can get bulbs from HD, since they are used as warehouse lights and such. I read that the MH bulb's color spectrum shifts fairly quickly which you can't see with your naked eye. I debated with myself between HPS and MH but chose HPS for stability. The plants in my living room are growing just fine under a 250W MH lamp. You can spend more $$ and get a MH with a different spectrum, even up to 5000K or so. They are commonly used by reef aquarist, who are much more concerned about spectra. But yes, changing the bulbs on a routine schedule, like yearly, is better than waiting for them to burn out. But the HPS is a red spectrum flowering light so some plants didn't do so well under it last winter. However, it might be worthwhile to get one of each and run the MH light from November to January or February and then the HPS light from January to planting outside time. I'm still learning about it. There are advanced tech bulbs, like http://www.altgarden.com/site/bulbs/page1hps.html designed for better spectrum, and better growing. I'd like to try "Deluxe" HPS lamps. They have a pretty good color rendering index, so they might provide enough blue light for the plants to grow better. I've only seen Deluxe HPS lamps in the lamp manufacturer's catalogs, never seen them for sale. Bob |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Good artificial light source
zxcvbob wrote:
John Hines wrote: Mark Anderson wrote: In article says... That's true. I have a florescent setup for vegetative growth plants using regular ballasts and 40W bulbs from Home Depot. I'd go with Metal Halide but I heard they can be a PITA to maintain. No problem at all. You have to change the bulb once a year or so. And you can get bulbs from HD, since they are used as warehouse lights and such. I read that the MH bulb's color spectrum shifts fairly quickly which you can't see with your naked eye. I debated with myself between HPS and MH but chose HPS for stability. The plants in my living room are growing just fine under a 250W MH lamp. You can spend more $$ and get a MH with a different spectrum, even up to 5000K or so. They are commonly used by reef aquarist, who are much more concerned about spectra. But yes, changing the bulbs on a routine schedule, like yearly, is better than waiting for them to burn out. But the HPS is a red spectrum flowering light so some plants didn't do so well under it last winter. However, it might be worthwhile to get one of each and run the MH light from November to January or February and then the HPS light from January to planting outside time. I'm still learning about it. There are advanced tech bulbs, like http://www.altgarden.com/site/bulbs/page1hps.html designed for better spectrum, and better growing. I'd like to try "Deluxe" HPS lamps. They have a pretty good color rendering index, so they might provide enough blue light for the plants to grow better. I've only seen Deluxe HPS lamps in the lamp manufacturer's catalogs, never seen them for sale. Alternative garden, the link above has both MH and HPS spectrum enhanced bulbs. The only other place I've seen interest in these kind of bulbs is for aquariums, who need 5000K and above for coral reefs. Everyone else is interested in the most light for the least $$, so the color quality is not important. The specialty bulbs are more expensive. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Artificial light for seed propagation | United Kingdom | |||
Artificial Light | United Kingdom | |||
[Tech] Artificial Light - Again | Orchids | |||
Indoor plants - artificial light only | United Kingdom | |||
Indoor plants - artificial light only | United Kingdom |