Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or
Harry Muscle wrote:
I know that surface turbulence is bad in a planted CO2 injected tank since it drives off the extra CO2 that is pumped into the tank. However, what about a planted non CO2 injected tank, like mine? I'm setting up a 55G planted tank with 1.75wpg, and instead of CO2 I'm using Flourish Excel. Do I want surface turbulence or not? Harry, if you are using Excel for a carbon source, I wouldn't worry too much about surface turbulence. We're talking normal HOB filter turbulence, and not Jacuzzi jets, right? --Andrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or
Harry Muscle wrote:
Harry, if you are using Excel for a carbon source, I wouldn't worry too much about surface turbulence. We're talking normal HOB filter turbulence, and not Jacuzzi jets, right? I was thinking air bubbles, my wife likes the look of them. I've got a tank with an air driven sponge filter that I use Excel on (when i remember to add it) and crypts, anubias, bacopa and najas all do fine. Growth isn't explosive, but I do see benefits from the excel. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or
Harry Muscle wrote:
Harry, if you are using Excel for a carbon source, I wouldn't worry too much about surface turbulence. We're talking normal HOB filter turbulence, and not Jacuzzi jets, right? I was thinking air bubbles, my wife likes the look of them. I've got a tank with an air driven sponge filter that I use Excel on (when i remember to add it) and crypts, anubias, bacopa and najas all do fine. Growth isn't explosive, but I do see benefits from the excel. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or
Harry Muscle wrote:
Harry, if you are using Excel for a carbon source, I wouldn't worry too much about surface turbulence. We're talking normal HOB filter turbulence, and not Jacuzzi jets, right? I was thinking air bubbles, my wife likes the look of them. I've got a tank with an air driven sponge filter that I use Excel on (when i remember to add it) and crypts, anubias, bacopa and najas all do fine. Growth isn't explosive, but I do see benefits from the excel. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or
Harry Muscle wrote:
Harry, if you are using Excel for a carbon source, I wouldn't worry too much about surface turbulence. We're talking normal HOB filter turbulence, and not Jacuzzi jets, right? I was thinking air bubbles, my wife likes the look of them. I've got a tank with an air driven sponge filter that I use Excel on (when i remember to add it) and crypts, anubias, bacopa and najas all do fine. Growth isn't explosive, but I do see benefits from the excel. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or
Eric Schreiber wrote:
I can't give any absolute answer, but I have a heavly planted 20 gallon with an Eclipse hood (lots of surface turbulance). I haven't injected CO2 for several months, and I don't even use Excel. Plant growth is excellent. Is that a 20g long? With an Eclipse 3 hood? I have one of those and my plants grow great! -- Victor Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam he Email me he |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Planted Tank Focus Group -- CO2 tank system | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Is 1.6 wpg enough for a low maintenance, non CO2 planted tank | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Optimum light period for planted and non-planted tanks..? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or bad? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Surface turbulance in a planted non CO2 inject tank, good or bad? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |