Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
water chem question for planted tank
I guess ill start with the basics, its a 37 gal all-glass tank with just
under 2 watts per gal, no CO2 injection yet. pH 8.4 total hardness 250 ppm total alkilinity buffer over 300 ppm (not sure cause it was drastically darker then the highest value of 300 ppm). NO3 approx 30ppm NH3 and NO2 unmeasurable. Well needless to say the tank was previously a home for african chiclids for the last 9 years. Since I was down to the last 1 I traded him and cat and pleco in and switched gears to a planted community tank, with 2 angels, 4 neon tetra, 2 corrys, 4 ottos and 3 neon dwarf rainbows with 10 camoba looking stem plant (definately not camoba tho) and about 6 stalks of generic hygro. Right now the plants are growing like mad, and algae is very low as usual. Now for the question, as you can see the fish would like the water with a pH of alot closer or slightly lower then 7 and I am no where near that and also it seems that many of the common plants would like a lower pH as well. So I am wondering if when I start adding CO2 will I be able to get the pH to a more accaptible range. Also I believe that the test my my hardness my be accurate since I do believe our well water sits above limestone, and I do not think our water would be phosphate buffered since I live on a narrow isthmus of .5 miles between 2 lakes. So anyways would CO2 get my pH down to a more reasonable level? Would the use of pH lowering additives be a good idea? Or don't worry about it and pray the fish will be fine, and be happy that my current 2 plant types are growing like mad? Any sites or personal info welcome on overcoming this problem, but unfortunately expensive fixes like RO systems are out of the question for me, as I am quite limited on spare cash. Thanks in advance |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
water chem question for planted tank
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 08:04:03 GMT, "Shakey"
wrote: I guess ill start with the basics, its a 37 gal all-glass tank with just under 2 watts per gal, no CO2 injection yet. pH 8.4 Pretty high pH for most fish, including tetras and corys. total hardness 250 ppm total alkilinity buffer over 300 ppm (not sure cause it was drastically darker then the highest value of 300 ppm). Wow! that's a dkH of about 17 (or more.) So anyways would CO2 get my pH down to a more reasonable level? Would the use of pH lowering additives be a good idea? Or don't worry about it and pray the fish will be fine, and be happy that my current 2 plant types are growing like mad? Any sites or personal info welcome on overcoming this problem, but unfortunately expensive fixes like RO systems are out of the question for me, as I am quite limited on spare cash. You would have to add so much CO2 to lower the pH to 'normal' levels, that the fish would probably die. Lowering the pH to just 7.2 would result in CO2 levels of over 32ppm - a tad high. Mixing your tap water with RO water would be best. A Cheap RO unit can be had for $60. Some grocery stores located in hard water areas have RO water dispensers out front - around 10 to 25 cents a gallon. Get a 6 gallon camping water carrier and fill 'er up! Mix your water down to a dkH of 7 or so, and THEN inject CO2 to obtain a pH of 6.9 to end up with a CO2 level of 26ppm - a tolerable level for most, if not all, fish pH Down and other such additives are a BAD idea, IMHO. They just don't work properly, and many contain phosphates that play havoc with water chemistry and algae blooms. With more CO2 you might need a little more lighting for best results. With that kind of water, perhaps you should consider a reef tank. ;-) This is just MY advice... Greg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
water chem question for planted tank
"Greg G." wrote in message ... On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 08:04:03 GMT, "Shakey" wrote: I guess ill start with the basics, its a 37 gal all-glass tank with just under 2 watts per gal, no CO2 injection yet. pH 8.4 Pretty high pH for most fish, including tetras and corys. total hardness 250 ppm total alkilinity buffer over 300 ppm (not sure cause it was drastically darker then the highest value of 300 ppm). Wow! that's a dkH of about 17 (or more.) Disclaimer: 2 things need to be mentioned, I can not guarntee that there is "not" some sort of phosphate buffer, and I hear those really mess with hardness values, but being so close to 2 lakes I do not think so, as I would assume the local DNR would be freaking out, but I don't have a clue how to go about finding out if that is the case. Second, I had these tests done at the local fish store, and they did not have hardness that was displayed in degrees only ppm. So anyways would CO2 get my pH down to a more reasonable level? Would the use of pH lowering additives be a good idea? Or don't worry about it and pray the fish will be fine, and be happy that my current 2 plant types are growing like mad? Any sites or personal info welcome on overcoming this problem, but unfortunately expensive fixes like RO systems are out of the question for me, as I am quite limited on spare cash. You would have to add so much CO2 to lower the pH to 'normal' levels, that the fish would probably die. Lowering the pH to just 7.2 would result in CO2 levels of over 32ppm - a tad high. Mixing your tap water with RO water would be best. A Cheap RO unit can be had for $60. Some grocery stores located in hard water areas have RO water dispensers out front - around 10 to 25 cents a gallon. Get a 6 gallon camping water carrier and fill 'er up! Mix your water down to a dkH of 7 or so, and THEN inject CO2 to obtain a pH of 6.9 to end up with a CO2 level of 26ppm - a tolerable level for most, if not all, fish Yikes I sorta feared that as I do not have a problem keeping up with water changes, but if I would have to make runs to get water, I have to be honest, I may end up being a bit lazy on that part. pH Down and other such additives are a BAD idea, IMHO. They just don't work properly, and many contain phosphates that play havoc with water chemistry and algae blooms. Yea thats what I was hearing too, so I was worried about that too as now the algae is very much in check. With more CO2 you might need a little more lighting for best results. Yes I agree on the lighting, but currently thats all my lighting system would hold, so just got some fresh bulbs when I made the switch and went with the newbie fast growing stem plants cause I wasnt sure if they would even grow but so far so good *knock on wood* With that kind of water, perhaps you should consider a reef tank. ;-) Yea thats been most of the reason I was keeping the africans, but I had em for almost 10 years so it was time for a change, I kept a reef about 15 years ago, but its just too expensive, especially now, since extra cash is a bit tight. This is just MY advice... Greg Thanks for the reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
water chem question for planted tank
i agree, keep a reef :-), wow ph 8.4!!! thats more than sea water. i
wonder how your fish are alive. i also agree do a water change, but, but, and but....slowly, not an abrupt one, a slow one. r/o is the best, no mineral trace. i suggest if you are so short in cash, collect rain water, its really soft, watch out for acid rain and pollution though. i use to do that with a tank i had almost 17 years ago, i was a student and as usual had no money, so i collected rain water to do water changes, my angels loved it. i collected also mosquitoe larvae in a bucket, my angels were so happy, they had the best of both worlds, soft water and live food. its all in the mind how you manage to do with no cash, but a nice and simple tank. take care "Shakey" wrote in message ... "Greg G." wrote in message ... On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 08:04:03 GMT, "Shakey" wrote: I guess ill start with the basics, its a 37 gal all-glass tank with just under 2 watts per gal, no CO2 injection yet. pH 8.4 Pretty high pH for most fish, including tetras and corys. total hardness 250 ppm total alkilinity buffer over 300 ppm (not sure cause it was drastically darker then the highest value of 300 ppm). Wow! that's a dkH of about 17 (or more.) Disclaimer: 2 things need to be mentioned, I can not guarntee that there is "not" some sort of phosphate buffer, and I hear those really mess with hardness values, but being so close to 2 lakes I do not think so, as I would assume the local DNR would be freaking out, but I don't have a clue how to go about finding out if that is the case. Second, I had these tests done at the local fish store, and they did not have hardness that was displayed in degrees only ppm. So anyways would CO2 get my pH down to a more reasonable level? Would the use of pH lowering additives be a good idea? Or don't worry about it and pray the fish will be fine, and be happy that my current 2 plant types are growing like mad? Any sites or personal info welcome on overcoming this problem, but unfortunately expensive fixes like RO systems are out of the question for me, as I am quite limited on spare cash. You would have to add so much CO2 to lower the pH to 'normal' levels, that the fish would probably die. Lowering the pH to just 7.2 would result in CO2 levels of over 32ppm - a tad high. Mixing your tap water with RO water would be best. A Cheap RO unit can be had for $60. Some grocery stores located in hard water areas have RO water dispensers out front - around 10 to 25 cents a gallon. Get a 6 gallon camping water carrier and fill 'er up! Mix your water down to a dkH of 7 or so, and THEN inject CO2 to obtain a pH of 6.9 to end up with a CO2 level of 26ppm - a tolerable level for most, if not all, fish Yikes I sorta feared that as I do not have a problem keeping up with water changes, but if I would have to make runs to get water, I have to be honest, I may end up being a bit lazy on that part. pH Down and other such additives are a BAD idea, IMHO. They just don't work properly, and many contain phosphates that play havoc with water chemistry and algae blooms. Yea thats what I was hearing too, so I was worried about that too as now the algae is very much in check. With more CO2 you might need a little more lighting for best results. Yes I agree on the lighting, but currently thats all my lighting system would hold, so just got some fresh bulbs when I made the switch and went with the newbie fast growing stem plants cause I wasnt sure if they would even grow but so far so good *knock on wood* With that kind of water, perhaps you should consider a reef tank. ;-) Yea thats been most of the reason I was keeping the africans, but I had em for almost 10 years so it was time for a change, I kept a reef about 15 years ago, but its just too expensive, especially now, since extra cash is a bit tight. This is just MY advice... Greg Thanks for the reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
water chem question for planted tank
So anyways would CO2 get my pH down to a more reasonable level? Would the
use of pH lowering additives be a good idea? Or don't worry about it and pray the fish will be fine, and be happy that my current 2 plant types are growing like mad? Any sites or personal info welcome on overcoming this problem, but unfortunately expensive fixes like RO systems are out of the question for me, as I am quite limited on spare cash. Thanks in advance I'd buy the CO2 if growing plants is your goal. RO water does not grow plants. Plants don't do better in softer water anymore than hard. Adding CO2 is what the plants really want. It will lower the pH also which will help the fish some, but many LFS's, hobbyist keeping SA soft water fish do not use RO/softening methods. I had a GH of 24, much higher than yours, KH of 15, my fish did fine(Rummy noses/cardinals etc). Plants did super. The water tasted like crap though. A little under 2w/gal is good. Add enough CO2 to get the pH to 7.2 to 7.3 and keep it there during the daylight period. The main purpose of adding CO2 is to supply the plants with carbon. When the plants are healthy, so are the fish. _Only_ use CO2 gas to lower pH in a planted tank. You get this down, the rest is relative easy to deal with(nutrients). Fish wise, you might not be able to breed some of these fish, but you can certainly keep many fish at the GH/KH levels from the well. You can also try out other fish, even some rift fish that don't dig/eat plants(there are plants in both lakes BTW). I contend it is a myth that anyone needs a RO for a planted tank, they might want it/need it for a _fish_, but _not_ for the plants. The only exceptions are a couple of salty cases and one high copper(2-3ppm Cu)tap. Regards, Tom Barr |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chem. Assays of Spec. Fruit and Veg. Cultivars Needed | Plant Science | |||
Planted Tank Focus Group -- CO2 tank system | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Chem strip question | Ponds | |||
RO for a planted tank: Shakey's tank | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
RO for a planted tank: Shaky's tank | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |