Menu

Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders

Search this Thread

#1

Report Post

Old

23-12-2002, 01:25 AM

Fred Elbel

Posts: n/a

Default

Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders

On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 05:16:33 +0000 (UTC),
(Larry Harrell) wrote:

"Corporate Interests" want that steady supply of small logs that will
result from thinning programs soon to be mandated by Congress. Loggers
want to go to work. People want to be safe from fires. The forests
need to be healthier, drought resistant and fire resistant.
"Management", as opposed to "preservationism" will get our forests
resored much quicker than "Mother Nature", as she works on very long
cycles without man's intervention.

Are you a corporate shill?

Share
- Share this post on
- Digg
- Del.icio.us
- Technorati
- Twitter

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is Off HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders	Richard Harter	alt.forestry	0	23-12-2002 04:51 PM
Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders	Norseman	alt.forestry	0	23-12-2002 07:35 AM
Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders	rick etter	alt.forestry	0	23-12-2002 01:59 AM
Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders	Larry Harrell	alt.forestry	0	22-12-2002 06:16 AM
Debunking the "more trees" lie once again (was Creationist Limbaugh doesn't unders	Fred Elbel	alt.forestry	0	21-12-2002 06:15 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 PM.

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

Contact Us Garden Banter Home Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2017