Michael Hagen wrote in message ...
In article ,
says...
You will note that the headers include alt.forestry, you will also not that
you post about oil slicks, and the political/environmental horrors you
associate with such. I would like for you to close the loop and explain
where oil slicks come under the area of "forestry"

Trim your damn headers.

"Punish Biosociopaths" wrote in
message om...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2497463.stm
snip

try switching over to Gravity - it's got good crossposter control and
filters.


Apparently, it's not enough to be a cyber-lobbyist anymore. Some feel
they have to be a "flooding" cyber-lobbyist and fight their fight
childishly, by shouting loud and often enough to drown out any opinion
against their's. Since there is plenty of eco-slanted articles in the
media, they just copy and paste, then flood several newsgroups at
once, on a consistent basis.

So, what it comes down to is that us foresters have to continue to
fight for the truth and our way of life in the forests. Educating the
cityfolk and earning the trust of the public is the only way to save
our forests from being "preserved to death".

Will radical eco-groups have their own cyber-terrorists? (I think
they're already here)

Larry