In reply to ) who
wrote this in , I, Marvo,
say :

On Jul 6, 3:32 pm, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:
In reply to )
who wrote this in
om, I, Marvo, say :





On Jul 5, 4:27 pm, Zhang DaWei wrote:

Yet more smear tactics. You really are unscrupulous in your
arguments here. Just because someone chooses not to discuss a moral
issue does not mean they have no morals. In my own experience,
which was being horrified to see the skinning of a dead dog in
public, the legs had definitely not been broken or bent backwards
to attach them behind their backs, and so I'm wondering under what
circumstances you think this universally applies in China.
--

Hello DaWei, welcome to urg!!!!

You are quite new here and once you have been here a little while,
you will know whose posts to respond to, those that give constant,
sensible, practical advice, they are numerous here. I hasten to add
that I do not include myself in that description, I am a mere
novice.

However, there are also those that could be said to
be ................ I can't find a polite word so I won't use one
at all, best to avoid them my dear as you will never have a sensible
debate, it will resort to insults and lies and I am sure that you,
I and others don't want that. I'm not saying that you shouldn't
make your point, I am just advising caution as to whom you are
expressing it.

There are some here that will give you a good debate, they may not
agree with you but you will certainly enjoy the interaction and it
will never turn nasty, look out for those, they are here but they
are never unkind or insulting.

And look up /ad/ /hominem/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Marvo, Angel, you may like to remember that you upset a great many
people here when you last posted and you left for some time, now lets
not get on that boat again, shall we?

Judith

Upset whom?

I don't think so.

On Jul 6, 3:42 pm, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:
In reply to ) who
wrote this in m, I, Marvo,
say :





On Jul 6, 3:32 pm, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:
In reply to )
who wrote this in
om, I, Marvo, say :

On Jul 5, 4:27 pm, Zhang DaWei wrote:

Yet more smear tactics. You really are unscrupulous in your
arguments here. Just because someone chooses not to discuss a moral
issue does not mean they have no morals. In my own experience,
which was being horrified to see the skinning of a dead dog in
public, the legs had definitely not been broken or bent backwards
to attach them behind their backs, and so I'm wondering under what
circumstances you think this universally applies in China.
--

Hello DaWei, welcome to urg!!!!

You are quite new here and once you have been here a little while,
you will know whose posts to respond to, those that give constant,
sensible, practical advice, they are numerous here. I hasten to add
that I do not include myself in that description, I am a mere
novice.

However, there are also those that could be said to
be ................ I can't find a polite word so I won't use one
at all, best to avoid them my dear as you will never have a sensible
debate, it will resort to insults and lies and I am sure that you,
I and others don't want that. I'm not saying that you shouldn't
make your point, I am just advising caution as to whom you are
expressing it.

There are some here that will give you a good debate, they may not
agree with you but you will certainly enjoy the interaction and it
will never turn nasty, look out for those, they are here but they
are never unkind or insulting.

And look up /ad/ /hominem/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Marvo, Angel, you may like to remember that you upset a great many
people here when you last posted and you left for some time, now lets
not get on that boat again, shall we?

Judith

Upset whom?

I don't think so.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As I said, lets not go there, Google has a long memory. Take it to
email if you like, my email address is valid.

Judith

In reply to ) who
wrote this in , I,
Marvo, say :

On Jul 6, 3:42 pm, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:
In reply to )
who wrote this in
m, I, Marvo, say :





On Jul 6, 3:32 pm, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:
In reply to )
who wrote this in
om, I, Marvo,
say :

On Jul 5, 4:27 pm, Zhang DaWei wrote:

Yet more smear tactics. You really are unscrupulous in your
arguments here. Just because someone chooses not to discuss a
moral issue does not mean they have no morals. In my own
experience, which was being horrified to see the skinning of a
dead dog in public, the legs had definitely not been broken or
bent backwards to attach them behind their backs, and so I'm
wondering under what circumstances you think this universally
applies in China. --

Hello DaWei, welcome to urg!!!!

You are quite new here and once you have been here a little while,
you will know whose posts to respond to, those that give constant,
sensible, practical advice, they are numerous here. I hasten to
add that I do not include myself in that description, I am a mere
novice.

However, there are also those that could be said to
be ................ I can't find a polite word so I won't use one
at all, best to avoid them my dear as you will never have a
sensible debate, it will resort to insults and lies and I am sure
that you, I and others don't want that. I'm not saying that you
shouldn't make your point, I am just advising caution as to whom
you are expressing it.

There are some here that will give you a good debate, they may
not agree with you but you will certainly enjoy the interaction
and it will never turn nasty, look out for those, they are here
but they are never unkind or insulting.

And look up /ad/ /hominem/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Marvo, Angel, you may like to remember that you upset a great many
people here when you last posted and you left for some time, now
lets not get on that boat again, shall we?

Judith

Upset whom?

I don't think so.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As I said, lets not go there, Google has a long memory. Take it to
email if you like, my email address is valid.

Judith

So is mine.

Anyone I upset, please let me know, on here.

Thanks

Marv

On 6 Jul, 15:46, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:
So is mine.

Mine's bigger than yours.

On Jul 6, 3:46 pm, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:

- Show quoted text -

As I said, lets not go there, Google has a long memory. Take it to
email if you like, my email address is valid.

Judith

So is mine.

Anyone I upset, please let me know, on here.

Thanks

Marvo, dearest, you are trying to do what you did before, now be a
good lad and stop it. I am not going to reply to you again as I want
to talk about gardening and gardening advice and the experts here,
which is what I was doing.

Judith

On 6 Jul, 15:55, "
wrote:

Angel, darling, dearest, where in this last paragraph of yours or on
this thread, or in the last 2 weeks have you been talking about
gardening, exactly?! If there's one to talk off topic, you're the
greatest one of us all! Not a complaint, naturally, just a simple
remark.

"... do and a motor mower! but it's all about reducing the risks and
I
try to but asbestosis when diagnosed is too late to do anything, it
is
terminal, there is no cure and the prognosis that when one displays
symptoms, it means that you have been exposed to it maybe 30 years
ago? I suppose if I am around in 30 years I wouldn't care too much
but right now all I can do is reduce the risk of everything that
could
be considered hazardous and that includes, it seems, breathing".

" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 6, 3:46 pm, "Uncle Marvo"
wrote:

- Show quoted text -

As I said, lets not go there, Google has a long memory. Take it to
email if you like, my email address is valid.

Judith

So is mine.

Anyone I upset, please let me know, on here.

Thanks

Marvo, dearest, you are trying to do what you did before, now be a
good lad and stop it. I am not going to reply to you again as I want
to talk about gardening and gardening advice and the experts here,
which is what I was doing.

er - you brought it up, Judith ...

Mary

On 6/7/07 16:11, in article
, "La Puce"
wrote:

On 6 Jul, 15:55, "
wrote:

Angel, darling, dearest, where in this last paragraph of yours or on
this thread, or in the last 2 weeks have you been talking about
gardening, exactly?! If there's one to talk off topic, you're the
greatest one of us all! Not a complaint, naturally, just a simple
remark.

"... do and a motor mower! but it's all about reducing the risks and
I
try to but asbestosis when diagnosed is too late to do anything, it
is
terminal, there is no cure and the prognosis that when one displays
symptoms, it means that you have been exposed to it maybe 30 years
ago? I suppose if I am around in 30 years I wouldn't care too much
but right now all I can do is reduce the risk of everything that
could
be considered hazardous and that includes, it seems, breathing".



That arose from the OP posting about badgers under the garage in his GARDEN.
Expanding the discussion happens naturally in all threads.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
(remove weeds from address)

On 6 Jul, 16:43, Sacha wrote:
That arose from the OP posting about badgers under the garage in his GARDEN.
Expanding the discussion happens naturally in all threads.

Point taken. Therefore she shouldn't poke her nose into something
beside gardening if she wants to talk about gardening, as she
explained. Responding to Uncle about off topic and then asking to stay
on topic is a bit twisted don't you think? I think there's some point
scoring here to be made. But I'm off to wash my hair now ...

On Jul 6, 4:33 pm, "Mary Fisher" wrote:

er - you brought it up, Judith ...



I did Mary, I did! I am off to have something to eat, whoops ,off
topic again but I will eat something that was grown in a garden this
morning.

Judith