Some tiny-dicked mere male wrote:

when there has not been a one true thing
established from which something else can necessarily follow.

Hey, Carol, since when does something have to be true for some other
thing to necessarily follow?

Some thing can be 100% false and some thing can still necessarily follow.

Logic 101 for ****wits
======================
Truth is not a necessary condition of some thing to follow since it is
possible for the thing to be true without the condition that follows
being true.

Logic is short suit, right?

Kissy! Kissy!